Back

Optimistic ants: Positive cognitive judgement bias but no emotional contagion in the ant Lasius niger

Wenig, K.; Kapfinger, H.; Koch, A.; Czaczkes, T. J.

2022-11-03 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2022.11.03.515024 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding the emotional states of animals is key for informing their ethical treatment, but very little attention has been directed towards the emotional lives of invertebrates. As emotions influence information processing, one way to assess emotional states is to look for an individuals cognitive bias, i.e., their tendency to make optimistic or pessimistic judgements. Here we developed a free-running judgment bias task for the ant Lasius niger, and applied the judgement bias to assess ants reactions towards positive and negative stimuli. After an initial learning phase in which individuals were trained to associate two odour stimuli with positive or negative reinforcement, their reaction towards ambiguous stimuli, i.e., a mixture between both odours, was assessed. We also explored our study species capacity to socially transmit emotional states ( emotional contagion) by investigating whether social information could elicit emotional responses. We find L. niger to be optimistic, showing a baseline positive judgement bias, with 65-68% of ants preferring an ambiguous 1:1 mix of positive and negative cues over no cues. Providing an unexpected food reward prior to the judgement bias task increases positive judgement bias (c. 75% positive). There was a non- significant tendency towards a negative judgement bias after experiencing a mild electric shock (c. 75% negative). Neither positive nor negative social information (trail and alarm pheromones, respectively) affected the ants judgement biases, thus providing no indication for emotional contagion. The development of a powerful, simple, and ecologically relevant cognitive judgement task, deployable in the lab and in the field, opens the door to systematic comparative studies of the evolutionary and ecological causes of judgement bias.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
3
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
5
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
6
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.8%
7
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
10
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
11
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
12
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
19
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%