Back

Plant protoplast-based assay to screen for salicylic acid response-modulating bacteria

Miebach, M.; Jiang, R.; Jameson, P. E.; Remus-Emsermann, M. N. P.

2022-11-02 microbiology
10.1101/2022.11.02.514867 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Leaves host remarkably diverse microbes, collectively referred to as the leaf microbiota. While many beneficial functions have been attributed to the plant microbiota, the individual contributions of leaf-colonising bacteria range from pathogenic to mutualistic interactions. Omics approaches demonstrated that some leaf-colonising bacteria evoke substantial changes in gene expression and metabolic profiles in the plant host, including plant immunity. While omic approaches provide a system level view on cellular functions, they are costly and laborious, thereby severely limiting the throughput of the number of bacterial strains that can be tested in planta. To enable cost-effective high-throughput screens, we have developed a plant protoplast-based assay to measure real-time target gene expression changes following bacterial inoculation. Here, protoplasts were isolated from leaves of stable transgenic plants containing a pPR1:eYFP-nls construct. Changes in yellow fluorescence were captured for up to 96 treatments using a plate reader. This allowed the monitoring of changes in the salicylic acid-dependent plant immune response over time. Protoplast isolation per se evoked mild fluorescence responses, likely linked to endogenous salicylic acid production. This is advantageous in a bacterial assay, as bidirectional changes in PR1 expression can be measured. Plate reader-generated data were validated via fluorescence microscopy and RT-qPCR. Fluorescence microscopy further demonstrated heterogeneity in the response of individual protoplasts, which is potentially linked to differences in cell-type. In summary, the protoplast assay is an affordable and easily up-scalable way of measuring changes in target gene expression to bacterial colonisation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.4%
2
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.2%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.4%
5
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
6
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
8
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
10
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Molecular Plant Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
12
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.1%
14
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
15
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
17
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
20
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
22
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.5%
25
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%