Back

G protein-biased LPAR1 agonism promotes prototypic antidepressant effects

Kajitani, N.; Okada-Tsucioka, M.; Inoue, A.; Miyano, K.; Masuda, T.; Boku, S.; Iwamoto, K.; Ohtsuki, S.; Uezono, Y.; Aoki, J.; Takebayashi, M.

2022-11-03 neuroscience
10.1101/2022.11.02.514841 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Prototypic antidepressants, such as tricyclic/tetracyclic antidepressants (TCAs), have multiple pharmacological properties and have been considered to be more effective than newer antidepressants, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), in treating severe depression. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the high efficacy of TCAs have not been completely understood. Herein, we found that lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 (LPAR1), a G protein-coupled receptor, mediates the antidepressant effects of amitriptyline, a typical TCA. Amitriptyline directly bound to LPAR1 and activated downstream G protein signaling without affecting {beta}-arrestin signaling, which implied that amitriptyline could act as a G protein-biased agonist of LPAR1. This biased agonism is unique to TCAs and has not been observed in other antidepressants, such as SSRIs. Long-term infusion of mouse hippocampus with 1-oleoyl-2-O-methyl-glycerophosphothionate (OMPT), a potent G protein-biased LPAR1 agonist, induced behavior similar to that induced by antidepressants. In contrast, LPA, a non-biased agonist of LPAR1, induced anxious behavior, indicating that LPAR1 may regulate conflicting emotional behaviors because of the downstream signaling bias. Furthermore, RNA-seq analysis revealed that LPA and OMPT have opposite patterns of gene expression changes in hippocampus. Ingenuity pathway analysis indicated that chronic intrahippocampal administration of OMPT could activate LPAR1 downstream signaling (Rho and MAPK), whereas LPA suppressed LPAR1 signaling. The results reveal the unique antidepressant effects of TCAs and indicate the potential of G protein-biased agonists of LPAR1 as targets for novel antidepressants.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.