A Fast Solution for Automated Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy Data Collection and Processing
Xu, S.; Kang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Shi, H.
Show abstract
Force spectroscopy is a sophisticated technology for studying the physical chemistry of polymers at the single-molecule level. Its implication in biomolecules, e.g., proteins, DNA or RNA, yielded tremendous information on their structures, folding, and functions. In a routine procedure, an experimenter pulls the molecule of interest to generate the force-extension (FE) curve using technologies that include atomic force microscopy (AFM), magnetic force spectroscopy (MFS), optical tweezer and acoustic force spectroscopy (AFS), then extract parameters characteristic to the polymer. The latter step requires fitting the FE curve with mathematical models. Although several models have been widely applied for over 20 years, the fitting of the experimental data was not as straightforward. This step can be time-consuming, prone to mistakes, and sometimes cause debate. To lower the technical barriers for users and to reduce the time consumption and errors involved in force spectroscopy data processing, we optimized the fitting procedure for three classical worm-like chain (WLC) models into an automated software package named Single Molecule Force Spectroscopy Toolkit (SMFST). Our MATLAB-based software with a graphical user interface demonstrated robust fitting for three models in a wide range of forces and provided convenient tools for batch data processing to meet future requirements of high-throughput data collection.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuous, Low Latency Estimation of the Size and Shape of Single Proteins from Real-Time Nanopore Data 95%
- Multiplexed protein detection and parallel binding kinetics analysis with label-free digital single-molecule counting 93%
- Multiplexed Ion Beam Imaging Readout of Single-Cell Immunoblotting 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.