Prefrontal stimulation disrupts motor memory consolidation at the micro timescale
Gann, M. A.; Dolfen, N.; King, B. R.; Robertson, E. M.; Albouy, G.
Show abstract
Functional brain responses in hippocampo- and striato-cortical networks during initial motor sequence learning (MSL) are critical for memory consolidation. We have recently shown that prefrontal stimulation applied prior to initial MSL can alter these learning-related responses. In the present study, we investigated whether such stimulation-induced modulations of brain responses can influence motor memory consolidation at different timescales. Specifically, we examined the effect of prefrontal stimulation on the behavioral and neural responses associated to (i) fast consolidation processes occurring during short rest episodes interspersed with practice during initial learning (i.e., micro timescale) and (ii) slow consolidation process taking place across practice sessions separated by 24h (i.e., macro timescale). To do so, we applied active (inhibitory or facilitatory) or control theta-burst stimulation to the prefrontal cortex of young healthy participants before they were trained on an MSL task while their brain activity was recorded using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Motor performance was retested, in the MRI scanner, after a night of sleep. Both our behavioral and brain imaging results indicate that while stimulation did not modulate consolidation at the macro timescale, it disrupted the micro-offline consolidation process. Specifically, our behavioral data indicate that active - as compared to control - stimulation resulted in a decrease in micro-offline gains in performance over the short rest intervals. At the brain level, stimulation disrupted activity in the caudate nucleus and the hippocampus during the micro-offline intervals. Additionally, multivariate pattern persistence from task into inter-practice rest episodes - which is thought to reflect the reactivation of learning-related patterns - was hindered by active prefrontal stimulation in the hippocampus and caudate nucleus. Importantly, stimulation also altered the link between the brain and the behavioral markers of the micro-offline consolidation process. These results collectively suggest that active prefrontal stimulation prior to MSL disrupted both the behavioral and neural correlates of motor memory consolidation at the micro timescale.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hippocampal and striatal responses during motor learning are modulated byprefrontal cortex stimulation 98%
- Multiple parietal pathways are associated with rTMS-induced hippocampal network enhancement and episodic memory changes. 96%
- The role of alpha oscillations in a premotor-cerebellar loop in modulation of motor learning: insights from transcranial alternating current stimulation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence for immediate enhancement of hippocampal memory encoding by network-targeted theta-burst stimulation during concurrent fMRI 97%
- Medial Frontal Theta Reduction Impairs Rule Switching via Prediction Error 95%
- Cerebellar GABA change during visuomotor adaptation relates to adaptation performance and cerebellar network connectivity: A Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging study. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cortical changes during the learning of sequences of simultaneous finger presses 96%
- Dynamic medial parietal and hippocampal deactivations under DMT relate to sympathetic output and altered sense of time, space, and the self 95%
- Cortical markers of PAS-induced long-term potentiation and depression in the motor system: A TMS-EEG Registered Report 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Retrieval Capacity of the Predictive Brain through Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Intervention 96%
- Stimulating prefrontal cortex facilitates training transfer by increasing representational overlap 96%
- Resting state fluctuations underlie free and creative verbal behaviors in the human brain 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.