Back

Improving the preclinical and clinical success rates of LMW drugs depends on radical revisions to the status quo scientific foundations of medicinal chemistry: a case study on COVID Mpro inhibition

Pearlstein, R. A.; Wan, H.; Williams, S.

2022-11-02 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2022.10.31.514572 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The poor preclinical and clinical success rates of low molecular weight (LMW) compounds can be partially attributed to the inherent trial-and-error nature of pharmaceutical research, which is limited largely to retrospective data-driven, rather than prospective prediction-driven human relevant workflows stemming from: 1) inadequate scientific understanding of structure-activity, structure-property, and structure-free energy relationships; 2) disconnects between empirical models derived from in vitro equilibrium data (e.g., Hill and Michaelis-Menten models) vis-a-vis the native non-equilibrium cellular setting (where the pertinent metrics consist of rates, rather than equilibrium state distributions); and 3) inadequate understanding of the non-linear dynamic (NLD) basis of cellular function and disease. We argue that the limit of understanding of cellular function/dysfunction and pharmacology based on empirical principles (observation/inference) has been reached, and that further progress depends on understanding these phenomena at the first principles theoretical level. Toward that end, we have been developing and applying a theory (called "Biodynamics") on the general mechanisms by which: 1) cellular functions are conveyed by dynamic multi-molecular/-ionic (multi-flux) systems operating in the NLD regime; 2) cellular dysfunction results from molecular dysfunction; 3) molecular structure and function are powered by covalent/non-covalent forms of free energy; and 4) cellular dysfunction is corrected pharmacologically. Biodynamics represents a radical departure from the status quo empirical science and reduction to practice thereof, replacing: 1) the interatomic contact model of structure-free energy and structure-property relationships with a solvation free energy model; 2) equilibrium drug-target occupancy models with dynamic models accounting for time-dependent drug and target/off-target binding site buildup and decay; and 3) linear models of molecular structure-function and multi-molecular/-ionic systems conveying cellular function and dysfunction with NLD models that more realistically capture the emergent non-linear behaviors of such systems. Here, we apply our theory to COVID Mpro inhibition and overview its implications for a holistic, in vivo relevant approach to drug design.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
15.1%
2
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.9%
4
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.8%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
8
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
9
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
10
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.5%
17
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
18
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
19
Nature Chemistry
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
25
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
27
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
ChemMedChem
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%