Assessing in vivo the impact of gene context on transcription through DNA supercoiling
Boulas, I.; Rimsky, S.; Espeli, O.; Junier, I.; Rivoire, O.
Show abstract
Gene context can have significant impact on gene expression but is currently not integrated in quantitative models of gene regulation despite known biophysical principles and quantitative in vitro measurements. Conceptually, the simplest gene context consists of a single gene framed by two topological barriers, known as the twin transcriptional-loop model, which illustrates the interplay between transcription and DNA supercoiling. In vivo, DNA supercoiling is additionally modulated by topoisomerases, whose modus operandi remains to be quantified. Here, we bridge the gap between theory and in vivo properties by realizing in Escherichia coli the twin transcriptional-loop model and by measuring how gene expression varies with promoters and distances to the topological barriers. We find that gene expression depends on the distance to the upstream barrier but not to the downstream barrier, with a promoter-dependent intensity. We rationalize these findings with a first-principle biophysical model of DNA transcription. Our results are explained if TopoI and gyrase both act specifically, respectively upstream and downstream of the gene, with antagonistic effects of TopoI, which can repress initiation while facilitating elongation. Altogether, our work sets the foundations for a systematic and quantitative description of the impact of gene context on gene regulation.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Conformational Heterogeneity in Human Interphase Chromosome Organization Reconciles the FISH and Hi-C Paradox 96%
- Active Transcription and Epigenetic Reactions Synergistically RegulateMeso-Scale Genomic Organization 96%
- Incoherent feedback from coupled amino acids and ribosome pools generates damped oscillations in growing E. coli 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.