MACE prediction using high-dimensional machine learning and mechanistic interpretation: A longitudinal cohort study in US veterans
Dhaubhadel, S.; Kolade, B.; Ribeiro, R. M.; Ganguly, K.; Hengartner, N. W.; Bhattacharya, T.; Cohn, J. D.; Agarwal, K.; Cho, K.; Costa, L.; Ho, Y.-L.; Murata, A. E.; Murata, G.; Vassy, J. L.; Posner, D. C.; Gaziano, J. M.; Sun, Y. V.; Wilson, P. W.; Madduri, R.; Justice, A. C.; Tsao, P.; O'Donnell, C. J.; Damrauer, S.; McMahon, B. H.
Show abstract
High dimensional predictive models of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE), which includes heart attack (AMI), stroke, and death caused by cardiovascular disease (CVD), were built using four longitudinal cohorts of Veterans Administration (VA) patients created from VA medical records. We considered 247 variables / risk factors measured across 7.5 years for millions of patients in order to compare predictions for the first reported MACE event using six distinct modelling methodologies. The best-performing methodology varied across the four cohorts. Model coefficients related to disease pathophysiology and treatment were relatively constant across cohorts, while coefficients dependent upon the confounding variables of age and healthcare utilization varied considerably across cohorts. In particular, models trained on a retrospective case-control (Rcc) cohort (where controls are matched to cases by date of birth cohort and overall level of healthcare utilization) emphasize variables describing pathophysiology and treatment, while predictions based on the cohort of all active patients at the start of 2017 (C-17) rely much more on age and variables reflecting healthcare utilization. In consequence, directly using an Rcc-trained model to evaluate the C-17 cohort resulted in poor performance (C-statistic = 0.65). However, a simple reoptimization of model dependence on age, demographics, and five other variables improved the C-statistic to 0.74, nearly matching the 0.76 obtained on C-17 by a C-17-trained model. Dependence of MACE risk on biomarkers for hypertension, cholesterol, diabetes, body mass index, and renal function in our models was consistent with the literature. At the same time, including medications and procedures provided important indications of both disease severity and the level of treatment. More detailed study designs will be required to disentangle these effects.
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Actionable absolute risk prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a behavior-management approach based on data from 464,547 UK Biobank participants 95%
- Development and Validation of the Michigan Chronic Disease Simulation Model (MICROSIM) 95%
- Evaluating the kidney disease progression using a comprehensive patient profiling algorithm: A hybrid clustering approach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 94%
- Artificial intelligence of arterial Doppler waveforms to predict major adverse outcomes among patients evaluated for peripheral artery disease 94%
- Long-term Outcomes of Peripheral Artery Disease In Veterans: Analysis of the PEripheral ARtery Disease Long-term Survival Study (PEARLS) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nationwide prediction of type 2 diabetes comorbidities 94%
- Can machine learning improve risk prediction of incident hypertension? An internal method comparison and external validation of the Framingham risk model using HUNT Study data 94%
- Multimodal AI/ML for discovering novel biomarkers and predicting disease using multi-omics profiles of patients with cardiovascular diseases 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using ECG Machine Learning for Detection of Cardiovascular Disease in African American Men and Women: the Jackson Heart Study 93%
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 92%
- Development and Multinational Validation of an Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Predicting Structural Heart Disease Using Noisy Single-lead Electrocardiograms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Mendelian randomization study of the role of lipoprotein subfractions in coronary artery disease 93%
- Risk factors affecting polygenic score performance across diverse cohorts 91%
- Systematic analysis of electronic health records identifies drugs reducing risk of COVID-19 hospitalization and severity 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.