Accurate prediction of children's target height from their mid-parental height
Zeevi, D.; Ben Yehuda, A.; Zangen, D.; Kruglyak, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundFor the past 50 years, standard guidelines have recommended the use of sex-adjusted mid-parental height to predict a childs final height. Here, we studied the accuracy of this procedure. MethodsWe used height data in a cohort of 23 very large nuclear families (Mean = 11 adult children per family). We compared the actual final height of the children to their height predicted by the standard procedure, as well as to alternative height predictions that incorporate corrections of mid-parental height for age, sex, and regression to the mean. ResultsStandard mid-parental height explained 36% of the variance in childrens heights, with a heritability of 74%, and children were on average 2.7 cm taller than predicted by their target heights. When we introduced a non-linear correction for the age of the parents, employed a multiplicative (rather than additive) correction for sex, and accounted for regression to the mean, the variance explained increased to 40%, heritability increased to 80%, and prediction bias was reduced from 2.7 cm to 0.14 cm (representing an improvement in prediction by half a standard deviation of the height distribution). We further measured the empirical distribution of heights of adult children around their predicted height. We describe how this distribution can be used to estimate the probability that a childs height is within the normal expected range. Conclusions and RelevanceBased on these observations, we propose an improved method for predicting childrens target heights. Our procedure for determining whether the deviation of a childs projected height from the target height is in the normal range can be used to assess whether the child should be tested further for potential medical abnormalities.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying genetic heterogeneity between continental populations for human height and body mass index 91%
- The contributions of biological maturity and experience to fine motor development in adolescence 91%
- A longitudinal causal graph analysis investigating modifiable risk factors and obesity in a European cohort of children and adolescents 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genes with Specificity for Expression in the Round Cell Layer of the Growth Plate are Enriched in GWAS of Human Height 93%
- The effect of plasma lipids and lipid lowering interventions on bone mineral density: a Mendelian randomization study 89%
- Identification of known and novel long non-coding RNAs potentially responsible for the effects of BMD GWAS loci 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ancestral diversity improves discovery and fine-mapping of genetic loci for anthropometric traits - the Hispanic/Latino Anthropometry Consortium 92%
- Rare coding variants in five DNA damage repair genes associate with timing of natural menopause 89%
- Functional characterization of pathogenic SATB2 missense variants identifies distinct effects on chromatin binding and transcriptional activity 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal obesity before pregnancy predicts offspring blood pressure at 18 years of age: A causal mediation analysis 91%
- Genetic and environmental effects on weight gain from young adulthood to old age and its association with body mass index at early young adulthood: an individual-based pooled analysis of 16 twin cohorts 90%
- Joint associations between objectively measured physical activity volume and intensity with body-fatness. The Fenland Study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disproportionate incidence of COVID-19 in African Americans correlates with dynamic segregation 87%
- Effectiveness of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions to Contain COVID-19: A Case Study of the 2020 Spring Pandemic Wave in New York City 86%
- Risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation rises exponentially with age, inversely proportional to T-cell production 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.