Back

Practice walking on a treadmill-mounted balance beam modifies beam walking sacral movement and alters performance in other balance tasks

Symeonidou, E.-R.; Esposito, N. M.; Reyes, R. D.; Ferris, D.

2022-11-01 physiology
10.1101/2022.10.30.514059 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The goals of this study were to determine if a single 30-minute session of practice walking on a treadmill-mounted balance beam: 1) altered sacral marker movement kinematics during beam walking, and 2) affected measures of balance during treadmill walking and standing balance. Two groups of young, healthy human subjects practiced walking on a treadmill-mounted balance beam for thirty minutes. One group trained with intermittent visual occlusions and the other group trained with unperturbed vision, providing greater variation in the balance performance outcomes. We hypothesized that the subjects would show changes in sacrum movement kinematics after training and that there would be group differences due to larger improvements in beam walking performance by the visual occlusions group. We also investigated if there was any balance transfer from training on the beam to treadmill walking (margin of stability) and to standing static balance (center of pressure excursion). We found significant differences in sacral marker maximal velocity after training for both groups, but no significant differences between the two groups from training. There was limited evidence of balance transfer from beam walking practice to gait margin of stability for treadmill walking and for single-leg stance balance, but not for tandem stance balance. The number of step-offs while walking on a narrow beam had the largest change with training (partial {eta}2=0.7), in accord with task specificity. Other balance metrics indicative of transfer had lower effect sizes (partial {eta}2<0.5). Given the limited transfer across balance training tasks, future work should examine how intermittent visual occlusions during multi-task training improve real world functional outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.