Back

Low back pain service utilization and costs: association with number of visits of chiropractic manipulation, active care, or manual therapy. A retrospective cohort study

Elton, D.; Zhang, M.

2022-10-30 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2022.10.28.22281664
Show abstract

BackgroundFor individuals with low back pain (LBP), in the absence of serious pathology clinical practice guidelines (CPG) recommend a stepped approach to management with first-line emphasis on natural history, self-care, and non-pharmaceutical therapies. For individuals with non-surgical LBP initially contacting a chiropractor (DC), physical therapist (PT), or licensed acupuncturist (LAc), the purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the dose response association between the number of visits of chiropractic manipulative therapy (CMT), active care (AC), manual therapy (MT), or acupuncture, exposure to second- and third-line services, and total episode cost. MethodsA national sample of individuals with a single episode of non-surgical LBP occurring in 2017-2019 was analyzed using episode of care as the unit of analysis. The primary independent variables were initial contact with either a DC, PT, or LAc, and the number of visits of CMT, AC, MT, or acupuncture. Dependent measures included rate and timing of use of 13 types of health care services and total episode cost. Results132,199 continuously insured individuals aged 18 years and older initially contacted 21,336 different DCs, 2,734 PTs and 1,339 LAcs for a single episode of non-surgical LBP. These individuals were associated with $62,185,930 in expenditures. The most common number of visits was 1 to 3 - CMT (48.2% of episodes), AC (29.7%), MT (32.1%), and acupuncture (27.0%). For each service, 1 to 3 visits was associated with the lowest rate of exposure to second- and third-line services although rate differences between visit dose categories were generally not significant or clinically. Episode total cost and duration increased significantly with increasing number of visits. CMT was associated with lowest median total episode cost at each level of visit utilization. ConclusionsFor non-surgical LBP episodes initially contacting a DC, PT or LAc, 1 to 3 visits of CMT, AC, MT, or acupuncture was the most common level of utilization, associated with the lowest exposure to second- and third-line services and lowest total episode cost. Among, CMT, AC, MT, and acupuncture, CMT was associated with the lowest total episode cost at each level of utilization. A higher number of visits of CMT, AC, MT or acupuncture was associated with significantly higher total cost, without meaningful impact on exposure to second- or third-line services. Unmeasured clinical benefits may be associated with higher visit counts and warrants further study.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 12%
1.8× avg
2
The Journal of Pain
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
#1
255× avg
3
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 13%
2.3× avg
4
PLOS Medicine
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 95 published papers
Top 3%
6.5× avg
5
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 74 published papers
Top 6%
4.2× avg
6
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 58%
2.6%
7
Frontiers in Digital Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
8
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 7%
3.4× avg
9
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 31%
1.5%
10
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 3%
8.2× avg
11
Systematic Reviews
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.8%
19× avg
12
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
SAGE Publications · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
13× avg
13
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Elsevier BV · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.7%
16× avg
14
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 15%
1.7× avg
15
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
6.6× avg
16
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 11%
0.9%
17
Gait & Posture
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
9.3× avg
18
F1000Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 28 published papers
Top 3%
5.0× avg
19
JAMA Network Open
American Medical Association (AMA) · based on 125 published papers
Top 16%
0.9%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 16%
0.8%
21
PeerJ
PeerJ · based on 46 published papers
Top 10%
2.4× avg
22
EClinicalMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 21 published papers
Top 1%
7.7× avg
23
BMC Geriatrics
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
6.3× avg
24
Health Expectations
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
7.8× avg
25
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 10 published papers
Top 1%
8.0× avg
26
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
7.7× avg