Results of safety monitoring of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) COVID-19 vaccine in U.S. children aged 5-17 years
Hu, M.; Wong, H. L.; Feng, Y.; Lloyd, P. C.; Smith, E. R.; Amend, K. L.; Kline, A.; Beachler, D. C.; Gruber, J. F.; Mitra, M.; Seeger, J. D.; Harris, C.; Secora, A.; Obidi, J.; Wang, J.; Song, J.; McMahill-Walraven, C. N.; Reich, C.; McEvoy, R.; Do, R.; Chillarige, Y.; Clifford, R.; Cooper, D. D.; Shoaibi, A.; Forshee, R. A.; Anderson, S. A.
Show abstract
ImportanceActive monitoring of health outcomes following COVID-19 vaccination offers early detection of rare outcomes that may not be identified in pre-licensure trials. ObjectiveTo conduct near-real time monitoring of health outcomes following BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination in the U.S. pediatric population aged 5-17 years. DesignWe conducted rapid cycle analysis of 20 pre-specified health outcomes, 13 of which underwent sequential testing and 7 of which were monitored descriptively within a cohort of vaccinated individuals. We tested for increased risk of each health outcome following vaccination compared to a historical baseline, while adjusting for repeated looks at the data as well as claims processing delay. SettingThis is a population-based study in three large commercial claims databases conducted under the U.S. FDA public health surveillance mandate. ParticipantsThe study included over 3 million enrollees aged 5-17 years with BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination through mid-2022 in three commercial claims databases. We required continuous enrollment in a medical health insurance plan from the start of an outcome-specific clean window to the COVID-19 vaccination. ExposureExposure was defined as receipt of a BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine dose. The primary analysis assessed primary series doses together (Dose 1 + Dose 2), and dose-specific secondary analyses were conducted. Follow up time was censored for death, disenrollment, end of risk window, end of study period, or a subsequent vaccine dose. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)We monitored 20 pre-specified health outcomes. We performed descriptive monitoring for all outcomes and sequential testing for 13 outcomes. ResultsAmong 13 health outcomes evaluated by sequential testing, 12 did not meet the threshold for a statistical signal in any of the three databases. In our primary analysis, myocarditis/pericarditis signaled following primary series vaccination with BNT162b2 in ages 12-17 years across all three databases. Conclusions and RelevanceConsistent with published literature, our near-real time monitoring identified a signal for only myocarditis/pericarditis following BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination in children aged 12-17 years. This method is intended for early detection of safety signals. Our results are reassuring of the safety of the vaccine, and the potential benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSDid active monitoring detect potentially elevated risk of health outcomes following BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination in the U.S. pediatric population aged 5-17 years? FindingsTwelve of 13 health outcomes did not meet the safety signal threshold following BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination in three large commercial claims databases using near real-time monitoring. Myocarditis/pericarditis met the statistical threshold for a signal following primary series vaccination in ages 12-17 years. MeaningResults from near-real time monitoring of health outcomes following BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination provide additional reassuring evidence of vaccine safety in the pediatric population. The myocarditis/pericarditis signal is consistent with current evidence and is being further evaluated.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- 2024-2025 BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in non-immunocompromised adults: mid-season estimates from vaccine registries in two states linked to administrative claims 95%
- Evaluation of Potential Adverse Events Following COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination Among Adults Aged 65 Years and Older: A Self-Controlled Study in the U.S. 95%
- A comparison of four self-controlled study designs in an analysis of COVID-19 vaccines and Myocarditis using Five European Databases 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of the Bivalent (Original/Omicron BA.4/BA.5) mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines mRNA-1273.222 and BNT162b2 Bivalent in Adults With Underlying Medical Conditions in the United States 94%
- Self-Reported SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination is Consistent with Electronic Health Record Data among the COVID-19 Community Research Partnership 93%
- Safety and efficacy of two immunization schedules with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in adults. A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world Effectiveness of BNT162b2 in Children and Adolescents in Preventing Infection and Severe Diseases with SARS-CoV-2 During the Delta and Omicron Periods: Findings from Trial Emulation Using an EHR-based Cohort 96%
- Anti-nucleocapsid antibodies following SARS-CoV-2 infection in the blinded phase of the mRNA-1273 Covid-19 vaccine efficacy clinical trial 93%
- Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine boosters against infection, hospitalization and death: a target trial emulation in the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant era 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Myocarditis After mRNA-1273 Vaccination: A Population-Based Analysis of 151 Million Vaccine Recipients Worldwide 96%
- Vaccine effectiveness of CanSino (Adv5-nCoV) COVID-19 vaccine among childcare workers – Mexico, March–December 2021 92%
- Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against hospitalization and death in Canada: A multiprovincial test-negative design study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.