Back

Acellular Cartilage-Bone Allografts Restore Structure, Mechanics, and Surface Properties In Vivo, but Limit Recellularization and Integrative Repair

Barthold, J. E.; Cai, L.; McCreery, K.; Fischenich, K.; Eckstein, K.; Ferguson, V.; Emery, N. C.; Breur, G.; Neu, C. P.

2022-10-28 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.10.27.514135 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The repair of articular cartilage after damage is challenging, and clinical interventions to promote regeneration remain elusive. The most effective treatment for cartilage defects utilizes viable osteochondral allografts from young donors, but unfortunately suffers from severe source limitations and short storage time. Decellularized tissue offers the potential to utilize native tissue structure and composition while also overcoming source limitations, but the long-term efficacy of acellular allografts is unknown. Here, we show that acellular osteochondral allografts improve functional and integrative cartilage repair in defect regions after 6 months in a preclinical (sheep) animal model. Functional measures of intratissue strain and structure assessed by MRI demonstrate similar biomechanical performance between implants and native cartilage. Compared to native tissue, the structure, composition, and tribology of acellular allografts conserve surface roughness and lubrication, native cartilage material properties under compression and relaxation, and compositional ratios of collagen:glycosaminoglycan and collagen:phosphate. However, while high cellularity was observed in the integration zones between native cartilage and acellular allografts, recellularization throughout the chondral implant was largely lacking, potentially limiting long-term cellular maintenance in the graft and repair success. Our results advance a suite of joint-to-cellular functional assays, demonstrate the biomechanical efficacy of acellular allografts for at least six months in vivo, and suggest that long-term implant success may suffer from a lack of cell migration into the dense decellularized chondral tissue.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.1%
4
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
6
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.3%
8
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
9
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.0%
11
Bone
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
13
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.2%
16
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
JBMR Plus
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
21
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
22
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Arthritis Research & Therapy
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%