Back

Phase-wise Impact Analysis of the Indian National Lockdown against COVID-19 Outcomes

Mhasawade, V.; Zadey, S.; Nair, A.

2022-11-01 public and global health
10.1101/2022.10.27.22281585 medRxiv
Show abstract

India was one of the most vulnerable countries to the COVID-19 pandemic considering the high transmissibility of the virus, exploding population, and fragile healthcare infrastructure. As an early counter, India implemented a country-wide lockdown and we aimed to study the impact of 4 lockdowns and 2 unlock phases on 6 outcomes: case growth, death count, effective reproduction number, mobility, hospitalization, and infection growth by two methods: interrupted time series (ITR) analysis and Bayesian causal impact analysis (BCIA) for nationals and sub-national levels. We observed that the effects are heterogeneous across outcomes and phases. For example, ITR revealed the effect to be significant for all the outcomes across all phases except for case growth in phase 1. BCIA revealed that the causal effect of all four lockdown phases was positive for deaths. At the state level, Maharashtra benefited from the lockdown in comparison to Tripura. Effects of lockdown phases 3 and 4 on death count were correlated (R=0.70, p<0.05) depicting the extended impact of phase-wise interventions. We observed the highest impact on mobility followed by hospitalization, infection growth, effective reproduction number, case growth, and death count. For optimal impact, lockdown needs to be implemented at the sub-national level considering various demographic variations between states.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.