Phase-wise Impact Analysis of the Indian National Lockdown against COVID-19 Outcomes
Mhasawade, V.; Zadey, S.; Nair, A.
Show abstract
India was one of the most vulnerable countries to the COVID-19 pandemic considering the high transmissibility of the virus, exploding population, and fragile healthcare infrastructure. As an early counter, India implemented a country-wide lockdown and we aimed to study the impact of 4 lockdowns and 2 unlock phases on 6 outcomes: case growth, death count, effective reproduction number, mobility, hospitalization, and infection growth by two methods: interrupted time series (ITR) analysis and Bayesian causal impact analysis (BCIA) for nationals and sub-national levels. We observed that the effects are heterogeneous across outcomes and phases. For example, ITR revealed the effect to be significant for all the outcomes across all phases except for case growth in phase 1. BCIA revealed that the causal effect of all four lockdown phases was positive for deaths. At the state level, Maharashtra benefited from the lockdown in comparison to Tripura. Effects of lockdown phases 3 and 4 on death count were correlated (R=0.70, p<0.05) depicting the extended impact of phase-wise interventions. We observed the highest impact on mobility followed by hospitalization, infection growth, effective reproduction number, case growth, and death count. For optimal impact, lockdown needs to be implemented at the sub-national level considering various demographic variations between states.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of social and environmental extremes on cholera time varying reproduction number in Nigeria 94%
- Spatio-temporal modelling of COVID-19 infection and associated risk factors in Dakar, Senegal 94%
- Estimating the relationship between mobility, non-pharmaceutical interventions, and COVID-19 transmission in Ghana 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the number of new infections with COVID-19 during the first epidemic wave 95%
- A causal inference approach for estimating effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions during Covid-19 pandemic 94%
- Which COVID policies are most effective? A Bayesian analysis of COVID-19 by jurisdiction 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and deaths: cross-national natural experiment in 32 European countries 93%
- Association between vaccination rates and COVID-19 health outcomes in the United States: a population-level statistical analysis 93%
- The relative effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on early Covid-19 mortality: natural experiment in 130 countries 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the effect of infection prevention and control measures on rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission to clinic attendees in primary health clinics in South Africa 93%
- Spatially regulated designs of incidence surveys can match the precision of classical survey designs whilst requiring smaller sample sizes: the case of snakebite in Sri Lanka 93%
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and response on the utilisation of health services during the first wave in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Better individual-level risk models can improve the targeting and life-saving potential of early-mortality interventions 94%
- A Comprehensive County Level Framework to Identify Factors Affecting Hospital Capacity and Predict Future Hospital Demand 94%
- Uncertainty and Inconsistency of COVID-19 Non-Pharmaceutical Intervention Effects with Multiple Competitive Statistical Models 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.