Back

Near-infrared II hyperspectral imaging improves the accuracy of pathological sampling of multiple cancer specimens

Zhang, L.; Liao, J.; Wang, H.; Zhang, M.; Han, D.; Jiang, C.; Jia, Z.; Liu, Y.; Qin, C.; Niu, S.; Bu, H.; Yao, J.; Liu, Y.

2022-11-01 oncology
10.1101/2022.10.27.22281545 medRxiv
Show abstract

Pathological histology is the clinical gold standard for cancer diagnosis. Incomplete or excessive sampling of the formalin-fixed excised cancer specimen will result in inaccurate histology assessment or excessive workload. Conventionally, pathologists perform specimen sampling relying on naked-eye observation which is subjective and limited by human perception. Precise identification of tumor beds, size, and margin is challenging, especially for lesions with inconspicuous tumor beds. To break the limits of human eye perception (visible: 400-700 nm) and improve the sampling efficiency, in this study, we propose using a second near-infrared window (NIR-II: 900-1700 nm) hyperspectral imaging (HSI) system to assist specimen sampling on the strength of the verified deep anatomical penetration and low scattering characteristics of the NIR-II optical window. We use selected NIR-II HSI narrow bands to synthesize color images for human eye observation and also apply artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm on the complete NIR-II HSI data for automatic tissue classification to assist doctors in specimen sampling. Our study employing 5 pathologists, 92 samples and 7 cancer types shows that NIR-II HSI-assisted methods have significant improvements in determining tumor beds compared with conventional methods (Conventional color image with or without X-ray). The proposed system can be easily integrated into the current workflow, and has high imaging efficiency and no ionizing radiation. It may also find applications in intraoperative detection of residual lesions and identification of different tissues.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.0%
3
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
4
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.1%
6
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
7
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Optics Express
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
10
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
15
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
17
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
19
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
23
International Journal of Biological Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%