Back

A Numerical Method to Compute Brain Injury Associated with Concussion

Bastien, C.; Scattina, A.; Neal-Sturgess, C. E.; Panno, R.; Shrinivas, V.

2022-10-27 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.10.26.513868 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Concussion can result from various events in everyday life, including falls, sports collisions, and motor vehicle accidents, which could lead to the disruption of neuronal cell membranes and axonal stretching, leading to a neuro-metabolic cascade of molecular changes in the brain. There is currently no agreement on which computational method can assess such low-level injuries. This paper demonstrates for the first time that the Peak Virtual Power (PVP), based on the Clausius-Duhem inequality, assuming that the injury is represented by the irreversible work in a human body, could be a candidate to capture brain distortion related to concussion. The work is based on the evaluation of the PVP via reconstruction of three NFL helmet-to-helmet impacts by means of finite element analysis, using validated Biocore helmet models fitted with calibrated Hybrid III headforms against linear and angular acceleration impact corridors, which were defined as realistic impact conditions for each collision scenario. Once the exact impact parameters were defined, the Hybrid III headform was replaced with a validated THUMS 4.02 human head model in which the PVP was computed for each head at the corpus callosum and midbrain locations. The results indicate that mild and severe concussions could be prevented for lateral collisions and frontal impacts with PVP values lower than 0.928mW and 9.405mW, respectively, and no concussion would happen in the head vertical impact direction for a PVP value of less than 1.184mW. This innovative method proposes a new paradigm to improve helmet designs, assess sports injuries and improve peoples wellbeing. HighlightsO_LIPeak Virtual Power method can capture brain distortion related to concussion C_LIO_LIConcussion is extracted from corpus callosum and midbrain locations of THUMS4.02 C_LIO_LIPeak power in midbrain less than 1.184mW for a vertical impact leads to no concussion C_LIO_LIPeak power in midbrain more than 0.928mW for a lateral impact leads to concussion C_LIO_LIPeak power in midbrain more than 9.405mW for a front impact leads to concussion C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 6%
26.5%
2
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
4
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
5
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.0%
7
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
8
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
17
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
19
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
20
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
21
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
22
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
23
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.0%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%