Back

A SOD1-dependent mitotic DNA damage checkpoint

Gatenby, R. J.; Li, N.; Lata, P.; Walne, T.; Tufail, A.; Breitweiser, A.; Thompson, R. H.

2022-10-26 molecular biology
10.1101/2022.10.26.513831 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In the event of DNA damage, the cell cycle can be slowed or halted to allow for DNA repair. The mechanisms by which this occurs are well-characterised in interphase, although the mechanisms underpinning mitosis slowing in response to damage are unclear. Canonical checkpoints and DNA repair pathways are largely repressed in mitosis, and whilst there is some level of mitotic DNA synthesis and repair, the bulk of DNA damage is processed for post-mitotic repair. How the decision is made between mitotic DNA repair and post-mitotic DNA repair is not known. We have identified the antioxidant enzyme Superoxide Dismutase 1 (SOD1) as an essential factor mediating delayed mitotic progression in response to DNA damage and replication stress. Cells depleted of SOD1 no longer exhibit DNA damage dependent mitotic delay, and display increased levels of damaged centromeres and mitotic defects. Whilst reactive oxygen species (ROS)-inducing agents also lead to SOD1-dependent mitotic delay, intracellular ROS levels do not correlate with mitotic arrest. SOD1 appears to play an important role in DNA repair in interphase and is recruited to the nucleus in response to DNA damage. In addition to control of mitotic progression in response to genotoxic stress, SOD1 also plays a major role in mitotic DNA synthesis. SOD- depleted cells show reduced levels of mitotic EdU incorporation in response to either replication stress or DNA breaks, seemingly in tandem with Rad51 andSOD1-depletion induced mitotic progression in the presence of DNA breaks is Rad52-dependent. We suggest that there are two responses to DNA breaks in mitosis; either arrest and mitotic repair or progression and post-mitotic repair; and these two pathways exist in a fine balance, controlled by a signaling cascade involving SOD1.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.4%
2
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
10.5%
3
Cell Cycle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.8%
5
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 31%
2.7%
10
Molecular and Cellular Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
12
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
13
DNA Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.7%
15
Molecular Microbiology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Cell Death Discovery
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
20
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
22
EMBO Reports
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
23
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.9%
25
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Redox Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
29
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
30
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%