Back

Time of Sample Collection Critical for Microbiome Replicability

Allaband, C.; Lingaraju, A.; Ramos, S. F.; Kumar, T.; Javaheri, H.; Tiu, M. D.; Machado, A. C. D.; Richter, R. A.; Elijah, E.; Haddad, G. G.; Leone, V. A.; Dorrestein, P. C.; Knight, R.; Zarrinpar, A.

2022-10-28 systems biology
10.1101/2022.10.26.513817 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although many aspects of microbiome studies have been standardized to improve experimental replicability, none account for how the daily diurnal fluctuations in the gut lumen cause dynamic changes in 16S amplicon sequencing. Here we show that sample collection time affects the conclusions drawn from microbiome studies and are larger than the effect size of a daily experimental intervention or dietary changes. The timing of divergence of the microbiome composition between experimental and control groups are unique to each experiment. Sample collection times as short as only four hours apart lead to vastly different conclusions. Lack of consistency in the time of sample collection may explain poor cross-study replicability in microbiome research. Without looking at other data, the impact on other fields is unknown but potentially significant. One-Sentence SummaryIf we are not controlling for host circadian rhythm time in microbiome studies when performing experiments, it is like trying to measure sea level rise while not knowing that tides or waves exist.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.