Back

Genomic epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 within households in coastal Kenya: a case ascertained cohort study

Agoti, C. N.; Gallagher, K.; Nyiro, J. U.; Lambisia, A. W.; Murunga, N.; Mohammed, K. S.; Mburu, M. W.; Moraa, E. M.; Makori, T. O.; Phan, M.; Cotten, M.; Ochola-Oyier, L. I.; Dellicour, S.; Bejon, P.; Githinji, G.; Nokes, D. J.

2022-10-30 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.10.26.22281455 medRxiv
Show abstract

Analysis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genomic sequences from household infections may provide useful epidemiological information for future control measures. Between December 2020 and July 2022, we conducted a case-ascertained household cohort study whereby households were recruited if a member was either a SARS-CoV-2 case or contact of a confirmed case. A total of 765 members of 214 households were prospectively monitored for SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission. Follow-up visits collected a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal (NP/OP) swab on days 1, 4 and 7 for RT-PCR diagnosis. If any of these were positive, further swabs were collected on days 10, 14, 21 and 28. Of 2,780 NP/OP swabs collected, 540 (19.4%) tested SARS-CoV-2 positive and viral genome sequences were recovered for 288 (53.3%) positive samples. The genomes belonged to 23 different Pango lineages. Phylogenetic analysis including contemporaneous Coastal Kenya data estimated 233 putative transmission events involving 162 members of the 89 households, of which 60 (25%) were intra-household transmission events while 173 (75%) were infections that likely occurred outside the households. In 34 (38%) households, multiple virus introductions were observed (up to six) within the one-month follow-up period, in contrast to high-income settings, where a single introduction seemed to occur during epidemic waves. Our findings suggests that in this setting control of respiratory virus spread by household member isolation will be ineffective.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.