Back

A novel non-invasive biomarker based on oral microbiome dysbiosis for detection of Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Sun, N.; Zhang, X.; Hou, Y.; Zhong, T.

2022-10-27 microbiology
10.1101/2022.10.25.513807 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEarly diagnosis of pathogenic bacteria is crucial for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but conventional diagnostics are limited by sampling difficulties. Oral microbiota has also been explored as a noninvasive biomarker of lung diseases, but its role in CAP has been neglected. We aimed to investigate whether the oral bacteria can be novel non-invasive biomarkers for CAP. MethodsOral swab samples were collected from 29 patients with CAP and 26 healthy volunteers and characterized based on clinical parameters and 16S rRNA profiling of oral bacteria. A predict functional profiling was performed for the functional and metabolic changes in oral microbial communities. ResultsOral microbial of patients with CAP had a lower diversity than healthy group. And the dominant bacteria were Streptococcus, Prevotella and Neisseria in CAP. Higher abundance of Prevotella (particularly Prevotella_melaninogenica), Veillonella and Campylobacter, and lower abundance of Neisseria and Fusobacterium were detected in CAP group. Analysis of the functional potential of oral microbiota demonstrated that the pathway involving infectious disease was overrepresented in the CAP groups relative to that in the healthy controls. ConclusionsOral microbial dysbiosis was found in patients with CAP, supporting the use of this non-invasive specimen for biomarkers of CAP. HighlightsO_LIOral microbial diversity was significantly lower in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients than healthy controls. C_LIO_LIGenera Neisseria and Fusobacterium were decreased, while genera Prevotella, Veillonella and Campylobacter were increased in CAP versus healthy controls. C_LIO_LIOral microbiota-based biomarkers can serve as a promising non-invasive tool for the detection of CAP. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.