Transposons repressed by H3K27me3 were co-opted as cis-regulatory elements of H3K27me3 controlled protein coding genes during evolution of plants
Hisanaga, T.; Wu, S.; Romani, F.; Kowar, T.; Linterman, R.; Jamge, B.; Montgomery, S. A.; Axelsson, E.; Dierschke, T.; Bowman, J.; Fujiwara, T.; Hirooka, S.; Miyagishima, S.-y.; Dolan, L.; Schubert, D.; Berger, F.
Show abstract
The mobility of transposable elements (TEs) contributes to evolution of genomes 1,2. Meanwhile, their uncontrolled activity causes genomic instability and therefore expression of TEs is silenced by host genomes 3,4. TEs are marked with DNA and H3K9 methylation that are associated with silencing in flowering plants 5, animals, and fungi 6. Yet, in distantly related eukaryotes TEs are instead marked by H3K27me3 deposited by the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) 7-11, an epigenetic mark associated with gene silencing in multicellular eukaryotes 12-15. It was therefore proposed that the ancestral activity of PRC2 was the deposition of H3K27me3 to silence TEs 16. To test this hypothesis we obtained mutants deprived of PRC2 activity and used genomics to analyze the role of PRC2 in extant species along the lineage of Archaeplastida. While in the red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae more TEs than genes were repressed by PRC2, an opposite trend was observed in bryophytes Marchantia polymorpha and Anthoceros agrestis. In the red alga, TEs silenced by H3K27me3 are in subtelomeres but in bryophytes, TEs and genes marked by H3K27me3 form coregulated transcriptional units. The latter trend was also observed in the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana, and we identified cis-elements recognised by transcription factors in TEs flanking genes repressed by PRC2. Together with the silencing of TEs by PRC2 in ciliates that diverged early from an ancestor common with Archaeplastida, our findings support the hypothesis that PRC2 deposited H3K27me3 to silence TEs in early lineages of eukaryotes. During evolution, TE fragments marked with H3K27me3 were selected to shape transcriptional regulation that control networks of genes regulated by PRC2. HighlightsH3K27me3 marks a decreasing proportion of TEs during evolution of plants The polycomb repressive complex 2 represses TEs in red algae and bryophytes H3K27me3-marked TEs in flowering plants contain transcription factor binding sites Transcription factors bind TEs and regulate networks of genes controlled by PRC2
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Transposable element over-accumulation in autopolyploids results from relaxed purifying selection and provides variants for rapid local adaptation 97%
- High-quality genome and methylomes illustrate features underlying evolutionary success of oaks 97%
- Unistrand piRNA clusters are an evolutionarily conserved mechanism to suppress endogenous retroviruses across the Drosophila genus 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The genomes and epigenomes of aquatic plants (Lemnaceae) promote triploid hybridization and clonal reproduction 96%
- Extensive horizontal transfer of transposable elements shape fungal mobilomes 95%
- The expanded Bostrychia moritziana genome unveils evolution in the most diverse and complex order of red algae 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Plant Mobile Domain protein-DNA motif modules counteract Polycomb silencing to stabilize gene expression 97%
- A gene silencing screen uncovers diverse tools for targeted gene repression in Arabidopsis 96%
- Stomatal regulators are co-opted for seta development in the astomatous liverwort Marchantia polymorpha 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Escalation of genome defense capacity enables control of an expanding meiotic driver 95%
- Organization principles of dynamic three-dimensional genome architecture associated with centromere clustering states 95%
- Topoisomerase VI participates in an insulator-like function that prevents H3K9me2 spreading into euchromatic islands 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.