Preclinical mobility limitation outcomes in rehabilitation interventions for middle-aged and older adults population: a scoping review protocol
Lai, A.; Morgan, A.; Richardson, J.; Griffith, L.; Kuspinar, A.; Smith-Turchyn, J.
Show abstract
ObjectivesThis scoping review aims to understand the extent of evidence regarding preclinical mobility limitation (PCML) intervention studies that have been implemented or planned in middle-aged and older adult populations. IntroductionIndividuals with PCML are at a high risk of future functional loss and progression to disability. An overview of studies undertaken on this emerging topic is now due. Inclusion criteriaRehabilitation intervention studies that measured PCML outcomes or assessed individuals at the PCML stage will be included. Studies will be considered if the participants are middle-aged (45-64yrs) or older adults ([≥] 65yrs) in any setting, including community-dwelling, hospital discharges, or institutional settings. MethodsSeven databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL) were searched to locate relevant published and unpublished intervention studies (English evidence from inception onwards). The search strategy will be generated using the PCC framework (population, concept, and context) and refined after consulting with a McMaster research librarian. In addition, a manual search from the reference list of retrieved papers and review articles will also be performed. Two reviewers will use predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria to independently review titles, abstracts, and full texts of potential articles. Any disagreements on study selection will be resolved by discussion or consensus involving a third reviewer. Data will be collected and reported using a predefined data extraction chart and described using qualitative content analysis.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital game-based interventions for cognitive training in healthy adults and adults with cognitive impairment: Protocol for a two-part systematic review and meta-analysis 96%
- Effects of 12 weeks of Multi-nutrient supplementation on the Immune and Musculoskeletal systems of Older Adults in Aged-Care (The Pomerium Study): Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial 95%
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 96%
- Effectiveness of aerobic physical exercise on depression symptoms in adults: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials 95%
- Considerations for ensuring safety during telerehabilitation of people with stroke. A protocol for a scoping review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fall Injury Avoidance Strategy Scale (FIAS): Development and Validation of a Scale to Quantify Fall-Related Protective Movements 92%
- Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: A non-randomized controlled trial 92%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Delphi Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Findings of a feasibility study of pre-operative pulmonary rehabilitation to reduce post-operative pulmonary complications in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease scheduled for major abdominal surgery. 90%
- Taxonomy of interventions at academic institutions to improve research quality 90%
- A cross-sectional audit and survey of Open Science and Data Sharing practices at The Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use and appropriateness of Reporting Guidelines in physical therapy research: a protocol for a meta-research study 93%
- The impact of retracted randomised controlled trials on systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines: a meta-epidemiological study 92%
- Methods used to select results to include in meta-analyses of nutrition research: a meta-research study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.