Back

Predicting yield traits of individual field-grown Brassica napus plants from rosette-stage leaf gene expression

De Meyer, S.; Cruz, D. F.; De Swaef, T.; Lootens, P.; De Block, J.; Bird, K.; Sprenger, H.; Van de Voorde, M.; Hawinkel, S.; Van Hautegem, T.; Inze, D.; Nelissen, H.; Roldan-Ruiz, I.; Maere, S.

2022-10-23 systems biology
10.1101/2022.10.21.513275 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn the plant sciences, results of laboratory studies often do not translate well to the field because lab growth conditions are very different from field conditions. To help close this lab-field gap, we developed a new strategy for studying the wiring of plant traits directly in the field, based on molecular profiling and phenotyping of individual plants of the same genetic background grown in the same field. This single-plant omics strategy leverages uncontrolled micro-environmental variation across the field and stochastic variation among the individual plants as information sources, rather than controlled perturbations. Here, we use single-plant omics on winter-type Brassica napus (rapeseed) plants to investigate to what extent rosette-stage gene expression profiles can be linked to the early and late phenotypes of individual field-grown plants. ResultsWe find that rosette leaf gene expression in autumn has substantial predictive power for both autumnal leaf phenotypes and final yield in spring. Many of the top predictor genes are linked to developmental processes known to occur in autumn in winter-type B. napus accessions, such as the juvenile-to-adult and vegetative-to-reproductive phase transitions, indicating that the yield potential of winter-type B. napus is influenced by autumnal development. ConclusionsOur results show that profiling individual plants under uncontrolled field conditions is a valid strategy for identifying genes and processes influencing crop yield in the field.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.8%
3
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.2%
4
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.8%
6
in silico Plants
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.5%
8
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.4%
9
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
11
Plant Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
13
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
14
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
16
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
18
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
20
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
22
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%