Potential Misrepresentation of Inherited Breast Cancer Risk by Common Germline Alleles
Letsou, W.; Wang, F.; Moon, W.; Im, C.; Sapkota, Y.; Robison, L. L.; Yasui, Y.
Show abstract
Hundreds of common variants have been found to confer small but significant differences in breast cancer risk, supporting the polygenic additive model of inherited risk. This widely accepted model is at odds with twin data indicating highly elevated risk in a subgroup of women. Using a novel closed-pattern-mining algorithm, we provide evidence that rare variants or haplotypes may underlie the association of breast cancer risk with common germline alleles. Our method, called Chromosome Overlap, consists in iteratively pairing chromosomes from affected individuals and looking for noncontiguous patterns of shared alleles without exhaustive enumeration. We applied Chromosome Overlap to haplotypes of genotyped SNPs from 9,011 female breast cancer cases from the UK Biobank (UKBB) at three topologically associating domains containing well-established common-allele "hits" for breast cancer. A total of 181,034 UKBB women of "white British" ancestry were used to assess the discovered haplotypes, and 55,346 cases and controls of European ancestry in the Discovery, Biology, and Risk of Inherited Variants in Breast Cancer (DRIVE) case-control study were used for replication. Out of twenty rare (frequency < [~]0.1%) risk haplotypes of large effect identified in UKBB at P < 1.0 x 10-5, four (hazard ratio: 4.22-20.2) were subsequently replicated in DRIVE (odds ratio: 2.13-11.9) at P < 0.05. Our results support the genetic heterogeneity and rare-variant/haplotype basis of breast cancer risk and suggest a novel type of "synthetic association" wherein common risk alleles on a rare risk haplotype may misrepresent disease risk through their tagging of many "false positive" haplotypes. SignificanceChromosome Overlap reveals that common alleles identified by GWAS may be poor surrogates for underlying high-risk haplotypes, necessitating a reappraisal of the polygenic model of disease risk.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A joint transcriptome-wide association study across multiple tissues identifies new candidate susceptibility genes for breast cancer 95%
- A polygenic score-based approach to identify gene-drug interactions stratifying breast cancer risk 94%
- Cancer PRSweb - an Online Repository with Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) for Major Cancer Traits and Their Phenome-wide Exploration in Two Independent Biobanks 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-Cancer Evaluation of Polygenic Risk Scores for 17 Cancer Types in Two Large Cohorts 95%
- Copy number losses of oncogenes and gains of tumor suppressor genes generate common driver events of human cancer 93%
- Assessment of Polygenic Architecture and Risk Prediction based on Common Variants Across Fourteen Cancers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pleiotropy-guided transcriptome imputation from normal and tumor tissues identifies new candidate susceptibility genes for breast and ovarian cancer 97%
- Rare coding variants in five DNA damage repair genes associate with timing of natural menopause 93%
- Evaluation of imputation performance of multiple reference panels in a Pakistani population 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.