Back

Repurposing of Drugs against mutated strain of Eurasian Avian like H1N1 (EA H1N1) Swine flu, Genotype-4 (G4) virus

Ghimire, S.; Sahukhal, S.; Shrestha, A.; Adhikari, S.; Subedi, S.; Budha, K. R.; Aryal, P.

2022-10-21 bioinformatics
10.1101/2022.10.20.512704 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mutation, reassortment and recombination have led to the evolution and the emergence of more pathogenic and new subtypes of influenza virus. The surge of highly mutated viruses has prompted the need of coherent solution for the so called "medical holocaust" viral outbreaks. The genotype 4 of EAH1N1 strain has been circulating in the swine population as a dominant genotype, exhibiting even human to human transmission. This has risen the possibility of causing another global health threat as a lethal viral outbreak in the future. The Computer Aided Drug Discovery (CADD) could be a prudent mechanism to develop new drug candidates against such disease for its mitigation. In this regard, the computational in silico methods had been envisaged in this research for the prediction of lead compounds against the selected proteins of EA H1N1 G4 strain, namely Haemagglutinin (HA) and Polymerase acidic protein(PA). The research focused on the selection of the target viral protein and molecular docking for the identification of putative ligands. It was followed by the identification of the probable mutations and assessment of effectiveness of identified drugs against their respective targets. Total of 3 compounds Enalapril, Enalaprilat and Ivabradine have been identified as a potential inhibitor of HA and PA protein that were prioritized on the basis of preference index parameter and binding energy of compound with the respective target. Besides, the probable mutations in each target protein in future were predicted and all these 3 top hits were found to be effective against mutated variant of these proteins. Thus, Enalapril, Enalaprilat and Ivabradine could be the lead compounds to explore further as multi target inhibiting drugs against wild and mutant variant of target proteins.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.