Back

Long-Term Forecasting of a Motor Outcome Following Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke via a Hierarchical Bayesian Model of Motor Learning

Schweighofer, N.; Ye, D.; Luo, H.; D Argenio, D. Z.; Winstein, C.

2022-10-21 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2022.10.20.22280926 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGiven the heterogeneity of stroke, it is important to determine the best course of motor therapy for each patient, i.e., to personalize rehabilitation based on predictions of long-term outcomes. Here, we propose a Hierarchical Bayesian dynamical (i.e., state-space) model of motor learning to forecast long-term changes in a motor outcome due to rehabilitation in the chronic phase post-stroke. MethodsThe model incorporates the effects of clinician-supervised training, self-training, and forgetting. In addition, to improve forecasting early in rehabilitation, when data are sparse or unavailable, we use a hierarchical Bayesian structure, which incorporates prior information from similar patients. We use this dynamical model to re-analyze Motor Activity Log (MAL) data of participants with chronic stroke included in two clinical trials: 1) the DOSE trial, in which participants were assigned to a 0, 15, 30, or 60-hour dose condition (data of 40 participants analyzed), and 2) the EXCITE trial, in which participants were assigned a 60-hour dose, in either an immediate or a delayed condition (95 participants analyzed). ResultsFor both datasets, the dynamical model accounts well for individual trajectory in the MAL during and outside of training and better fits the data than other simpler models without the effects of either supervised training, self-training or forgetting or (static) regression models. We then show how the model can be used to forecast the MAL of new participants up to 8 months ahead and how the hierarchical structure improves the accuracy of the predictions early in training when data are sparse. Finally, we verify that this model, despite its simplicity, can reproduce previous findings of the DOSE trial on the efficiency, efficacy, and retention of motor therapy. ConclusionIn future work, such forecasting models can be simulated for different stages of recovery, dosages, and training schedules to optimize rehabilitation for each person.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.1%
50% of probability mass above
3
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.9%
4
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
6
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
7
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
8
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
9
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
10
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
12
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
13
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
14
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
15
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
19
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
22
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.5%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%