Long-term responses of life-history strategies to climatic variability in flowering plants
Boyko, J. D.; Hagen, E. R.; Beaulieu, J.; Vasconcelos, T.
Show abstract
O_LIThe evolution of annual or perennial strategies in flowering plants may depend on a broad array of temperature and precipitation variables. Previously documented correlations between life history strategy and climate appear to be clade-specific and fail to consider the coevolution of climatic niches and life history strategies. C_LIO_LIHere we combine annual and perennial life history data with geographic distribution for 9,939 flowering plant species and utilize a recently developed method that accounts for the joint evolution of continuous and discrete traits to evaluate two hypotheses: (1) annuals tend to evolve in highly seasonal regions prone to extreme heat and drought, and (2) annuals tend to have faster rates of climatic niche evolution than perennials. C_LIO_LIWe find temperature, particularly the maximum temperature of the warmest month, is the most consistent climatic factor influencing life history evolution in flowering plants. Unexpectedly, we find that the rates of climatic niche evolution are faster in perennials than in annual lineages. C_LIO_LIWe propose that annuals are consistently favored in areas prone to extreme heat due to their ability to escape heat stress as seeds, but they tend to be outcompeted by perennials in regions where extreme heat is uncommon or nonexistent. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- How important are functional and developmental constraints on phenotypic evolution? An empirical test with the stomatal anatomy of flowering plants 95%
- Plant-pollinator Specialization: Origin and measurement of curvature 92%
- Size-dependent sex allocation and the expression of andromonoecy in a protogynous perennial herb: both size and timing matter 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.