Back

3D genome topologies distinguish pluripotent epiblast and primitive endoderm cells in the mouse blastocyst

Loof, G.; Szabo, D.; Garg, V.; Kukalev, A.; Zea-Redondo, L.; Kempfer, R.; Sparks, T. M.; Zhang, Y.; Thieme, C. J.; Carvalho, S.; Weise, A.; Balachandran, M.; Liehr, T.; Welch, L. R.; Hadjantonakis, A.-K.; Pombo, A.

2022-10-20 developmental biology
10.1101/2022.10.19.512781 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The development of embryonic cell lineages is tightly controlled by transcription factors that regulate gene expression and chromatin organisation. To investigate the specialisation of 3D genome structure in pluripotent or extra-embryonic endoderm lineages, we applied Genome Architecture Mapping (GAM) in embryonic stem (ES) cells, extra-embryonic endoderm (XEN) stem cells, and in their in vivo counterparts, the epiblast (Epi) and primitive endoderm (PrE) cells, respectively. We discover extensive differences in 3D genome topology including the formation domain boundaries that differ between Epi and PrE lineages, both in vivo and in vitro, at lineage commitment genes. In ES cells, Sox2 contacts other active regions enriched for NANOG and SOX2 binding sites. PrE-specific genes, such as Lama1 and Gata6, form repressive chromatin hubs in ES cells. Lama1 activation in XEN or PrE cells coincides with its extensive decondensation. Putative binding sites for OCT4 and SNAIL, or GATA4/6, distinguish chromatin contacts unique to embryonic or extra-embryonic lineages, respectively. Overall, 3D genome folding is highly specialised in early development, especially at genes encoding factors driving lineage identity. HighlightsO_LIES and XEN cells have specialised 3D genome structures C_LIO_LIGAM applied in the blastocyst distinguishes Epi and PrE genome structures C_LIO_LILineage specific genes establish cell-type specific chromatin contacts C_LIO_LISpecific chromatin contacts feature putative bindings sites for GATA4/6 in XEN cells and SNAIL in ES cells C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.