Towards Out-of-Lab Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Prevention and Rehabilitation Assessment: A Review of Portable Sensing Approaches
Tan, T.; Gatti, A.; Fan, B.; Shea, K.; Sherman, S.; Uhlrich, S.; Hicks, J.; Delp, S.; Shull, P.; Chaudhari, A.
Show abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery are common. Many ACL-injured subjects develop osteoarthritis within a decade of injury, a major cause of disability without cure. Laboratory-based biomechanical assessment can evaluate ACL injury risk and rehabilitation progress after ACLR; however, lab-based measurements are expensive and inaccessible to a majority of people. Portable sensors such as wearables and cameras can be deployed during sporting activities, in clinics, and in patient homes for biomechanical assessment. Although many portable sensing approaches have demonstrated promising results during various assessments related to ACL injury, they have not yet been widely adopted as tools for ACL injury prevention training, evaluation of ACL reconstructions, and return-to-sport decision making. The purpose of this review is to summarize research on out-of-lab portable sensing applied to ACL and ACLR and offer our perspectives on new opportunities for future research and development. We identified 49 original research articles on out-of-lab ACL-related assessment; the most common sensing modalities were inertial measurement units (IMUs), depth cameras, and RGB cameras. The studies combined portable sensors with direct feature extraction, physics-based modeling, or machine learning to estimate a range of biomechanical parameters (e.g., knee kinematics and kinetics) during jump-landing tasks, cutting, squats, and gait. Many of the reviewed studies depict proof-of-concept methods for potential future clinical applications including ACL injury risk screening, injury prevention training, and rehabilitation assessment. By synthesizing these results, we describe important opportunities that exist for using sophisticated modeling techniques to enable more accurate assessment along with standardization of data collection and creation of large benchmark datasets. If successful, these advances will enable widespread use of portable-sensing approaches to identify ACL injury risk factors, mitigate high-risk movements prior to injury, and optimize rehabilitation paradigms.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in external loads of different pitch types in Chinese male college baseball players 95%
- Evaluation of 3D markerless motion capture accuracy using OpenPose with multiple video cameras 93%
- Head and body dyskinesia during gait in tactical athletes with vestibular deficit following concussion 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Muscle activity of cutting manoeuvres and soccer inside passing suggests an increased groin injury risk during these movements 96%
- Quantifying changes in individual-specific template-based representations of center-of-mass dynamics during walking with ankle exoskeletons using Hybrid-SINDy 94%
- Quantifying mechanical loading and elastic strain energy of the human Achilles tendon during walking and running 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Investigation of Nonlinear Variability Underlying Postural Control in The Injure-Limb in Individuals with and without Chronic Ankle Instability 95%
- Does increased gait variability improve stability when faced with an expected balance perturbation during treadmill walking? 95%
- Predicting vertical and shear ground reaction forces during walking and jogging using wearable plantar pressure insoles 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Are Electromyography data a fingerprint for patients with cerebral palsy (CP)? 94%
- Angle-angle diagrams in the assessment of locomotion in persons with multiple sclerosis: A preliminary study 92%
- Genetic deletion of interleukin-15 is not associated with major structural changes following experimental post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis in rats 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.