Back

A New Hope for Liquid Biopsies: Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer By Means of Protease Activity Detection in Serum Applying a Hierarchical Decision Structure

Covarrubias-Zambrano, O.; Agarwal, D.; Kalubowilage, M.; Ehsan, S.; Yapa, A.; Covarrubias, J.; Kasi, A.; Natarajan, B.; Bossmann, S. H.

2022-10-21 oncology
10.1101/2022.10.18.22281240 medRxiv
Show abstract

Over the last 6 years, five-year survival rate for pancreatic cancer patients has increased from 6 to 10% after the initial diagnosis, which makes it one of the deadliest cancer types. This disease is known as the "silent killer" because early detection is challenging due to the location of the pancreas in the body and the nonspecific clinical symptoms. The Bossmann group has developed ultrasensitive nanobiosensors for protease/arginase detection comprised of Fe/Fe3O4 nanoparticles, cyanine 5.5, and designer peptide sequences linked to TCPP. Initial data obtained from both gene expression analysis and protease/arginase activity detection in serum indicated the feasibility of early pancreatic cancer detection. Several matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs, -1, -3, and -9), cathepsins (CTS) B and E, neutrophil elastase, and urokinase plaminogen activator (uPA) have been identified as candidates for proximal biomarkers. In this study, we have confirmed our initial results from 2018 performing serum sample analysis assays using a larger group sample size (n=159), which included localized (n=33) and metastatic pancreatic cancer (n=50), pancreatitis (n=26), and an age-matched healthy control group (n=50). The data obtained from the eight nanobiosensors capable of ultrasensitive protease and arginase activity measurements were analyzed by means of an optimized information fusion-based hierarchical decision structure. This permits the modeling of early-stage detection of pancreatic cancer as a multi-class classification problem. The most striking result is that this methodology permits the detection of localized pancreatic cancers from serum analyses with 96% accuracy.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
43.6%
2
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
5.3%
4
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
5
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
6
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.3%
8
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
11
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
13
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
14
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
15
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
16
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
17
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.5%
24
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%