Back

Did Risk-based or Age-based Vaccine Prioritization for Covid-19 Save More Lives?

Smits, J.; Malik, A. A.; Elharake, J. A.; Mobarak, A. M.; Omer, S. B.

2022-10-21 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.10.18.22281237 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceAll U.S. states provided Covid-19 vaccine access to frontline healthcare workers first, but after that, states varied in whether they gave earlier access to the elderly, versus the vulnerable with comorbidities, or school employees or essential workers, reflecting the underlying scientific and policy uncertainty. ObjectiveTo evaluate if risk-based or age-based prioritization is more effective at reducing reported Covid-19 cases and deaths. DesignA serial cross-sectional study Setting50 U.S. states and Washington D.C. Participants60+ years of age, high-risk individuals, K-12 school employees, and essential workers Main Outcomes and MeasuresHospitalizations and deaths ResultsSeven to nine weeks after 60-year-olds became eligible for a vaccine, there was a statistically significant 40-50% decline in Covid-19 hospitalizations in that state. In contrast, there was no statistically detectable change in hospitalizations in the 7-9 weeks after K-12 employees become eligible for vaccines. Vaccine eligibility of "high-risk adults" and "essential workers" produces effects somewhere in the middle, with reductions in hospitalization of about 25%. There was a large statistically significant decline in death rates (25-38%) 10 to 11 weeks after people aged over 60 became vaccine-eligible. These effects were generally statistically larger than high risk individuals, K-12 school employees, and essential workers. Conclusions and RelevancePanel data analysis of weekly variation in Covid-19 health outcomes reveals that prioritizing adults 60+ years of age is associated with the largest reduction in hospitalizations and Covid-19 cases, followed by vaccines for adults with high-risk comorbidities. Vaccinations extended to K-12 school employees and essential workers is associated with the smallest reductions in hospitalizations and deaths. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSDid Risk-based or Age-based Vaccine Prioritization for Covid-19 Save More Lives? FindingsPanel data analysis of weekly variation in Covid-19 health outcomes reveals that prioritizing adults 60+ years of age is associated with the largest reduction in hospitalizations and Covid-19 cases, followed by vaccines for adults with high-risk comorbidities. Vaccinations extended to K-12 school employees and essential workers is associated with the smallest reductions in hospitalizations and deaths. MeaningPrioritizing adults 60+ years of age can lead to a higher estimated reduction in hospitalizations and deaths, followed by a strategy of prioritizing adults with high-risk comorbidities. Our findings add to the limited evidence for the roadmap for prioritizing use of Covid-19 vaccines, and help address uncertainties about the relative effectiveness of different vaccine strategies.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.2%
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.1%
3
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.1%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
5
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
6
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.8%
8
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
11
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
12
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
13
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
15
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
16
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
17
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
18
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
20
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
21
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Journal of Medical Economics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
24
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
27
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
28
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
29
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%