Did Risk-based or Age-based Vaccine Prioritization for Covid-19 Save More Lives?
Smits, J.; Malik, A. A.; Elharake, J. A.; Mobarak, A. M.; Omer, S. B.
Show abstract
ImportanceAll U.S. states provided Covid-19 vaccine access to frontline healthcare workers first, but after that, states varied in whether they gave earlier access to the elderly, versus the vulnerable with comorbidities, or school employees or essential workers, reflecting the underlying scientific and policy uncertainty. ObjectiveTo evaluate if risk-based or age-based prioritization is more effective at reducing reported Covid-19 cases and deaths. DesignA serial cross-sectional study Setting50 U.S. states and Washington D.C. Participants60+ years of age, high-risk individuals, K-12 school employees, and essential workers Main Outcomes and MeasuresHospitalizations and deaths ResultsSeven to nine weeks after 60-year-olds became eligible for a vaccine, there was a statistically significant 40-50% decline in Covid-19 hospitalizations in that state. In contrast, there was no statistically detectable change in hospitalizations in the 7-9 weeks after K-12 employees become eligible for vaccines. Vaccine eligibility of "high-risk adults" and "essential workers" produces effects somewhere in the middle, with reductions in hospitalization of about 25%. There was a large statistically significant decline in death rates (25-38%) 10 to 11 weeks after people aged over 60 became vaccine-eligible. These effects were generally statistically larger than high risk individuals, K-12 school employees, and essential workers. Conclusions and RelevancePanel data analysis of weekly variation in Covid-19 health outcomes reveals that prioritizing adults 60+ years of age is associated with the largest reduction in hospitalizations and Covid-19 cases, followed by vaccines for adults with high-risk comorbidities. Vaccinations extended to K-12 school employees and essential workers is associated with the smallest reductions in hospitalizations and deaths. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSDid Risk-based or Age-based Vaccine Prioritization for Covid-19 Save More Lives? FindingsPanel data analysis of weekly variation in Covid-19 health outcomes reveals that prioritizing adults 60+ years of age is associated with the largest reduction in hospitalizations and Covid-19 cases, followed by vaccines for adults with high-risk comorbidities. Vaccinations extended to K-12 school employees and essential workers is associated with the smallest reductions in hospitalizations and deaths. MeaningPrioritizing adults 60+ years of age can lead to a higher estimated reduction in hospitalizations and deaths, followed by a strategy of prioritizing adults with high-risk comorbidities. Our findings add to the limited evidence for the roadmap for prioritizing use of Covid-19 vaccines, and help address uncertainties about the relative effectiveness of different vaccine strategies.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Time trends between vaccination coverage and voting patterns before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: analysis of COVID-19 and flu surveys in the United States 94%
- Does COVID-19 vaccination improve mental health? A difference-in-difference analysis of the Understanding Coronavirus in America study 93%
- Willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 in the US: Longitudinal evidence from a nationally representative sample of adults from April–October 2020 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimation of COVID-19 cases prevented by vaccination in California 94%
- The Joint Impact of COVID-19 Vaccination and Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on Infections, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: An Agent-Based Simulation 94%
- Health impact and cost of COVID-19 prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protection of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection is similar to that of BNT162b2 vaccine protection: A three-month nationwide experience from Israel 94%
- Magnitude of Potential Biases in COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Studies due to Differential Healthcare seeking following Home Testing: Implications for Test Negative Design Studies 93%
- How Timing of Stay-at-home Orders and Mobility Reductions Impacted First-Wave COVID-19 Deaths in US Counties 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines on Covid-19 Incidence and Mortality in the United States 95%
- The Impact of Vaccination to Control COVID-19 Burden in the United States: A Simulation Modeling Approach 94%
- Relative contribution of COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection to population-level seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies in a large integrated health system 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety Monitoring of Health Outcomes following Influenza Vaccination during the 2023-2024 Season among U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 65 Years and Older 94%
- Projected COVID-19 epidemic in the United States in the context of the effectiveness of a potential vaccine and implications for social distancing and face mask use 94%
- Employer Requirements and COVID-19 Vaccination and Attitudes among Healthcare Personnel in the U.S.: Findings from National Immunization Survey Adult COVID Module, August – September 2021 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.