Back

Fatigue presentation, severity, and related outcomes 12 weeks post-COVID-19 hospitalization

Magel, T.; Meagher, E.; Boulter, T.; Albert, A.; Tsai, M.; Munoz, C.; Carlsten, C.; Johnston, J.; Wong, A.; Shah, A.; Ryerson, C.; McKay, R. J.; Nacul, L.

2022-10-20 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.10.18.22280199 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIncreasing evidence on long-term health outcomes following SARS CoV-2 infection shows post-viral symptoms can persist for months. The aim of the present study was to examine the prevalence and outcome predictors of post-viral fatigue and related symptoms 3 and 6 months following infection. MethodsA prospective cohort of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (n=88) were recruited from a Post-COVID-19 Respiratory Clinic (PCRC) in Vancouver, Canada to examine predictors of long-term fatigue and substantial fatigue. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analysis were used to examine the relationship between patient predictors (medical history at the time of hospitalization and follow-up patient-reported outcome measures) and the presentation of fatigue and substantial fatigue at 3 and 6 months follow-up. ResultsThe number of patients exhibiting fatigue and substantial fatigue was 58 (67%) and 14 (16%) at 3 months and 47 (60%) and 6 (7%) at 6 months post-infection, respectively. Adjusted analysis revealed the number of pre-existing comorbidities to be associated with fatigue (OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.09-4.49; 0.028) and substantial fatigue (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.06-2.95; 0.033) at 3 months follow-up. Except for shortness of breath, self-care, and time, all follow-up variables were found to be associated with fatigue and substantial fatigue at 3 months follow-up. ConclusionFatigue and substantial fatigue are common, and decrease from 3 to 6 months; however, a significant number of patients continue to exhibit long-term fatigue at 6 months follow-up. Further research is needed to clarify the causality of viral infections and co-factors in the development and severity of fatigue as a symptom and in meeting post-viral fatigue syndrome or ME/CFS diagnostic criteria.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.