Decolonizing WASH Research: Results of a qualitative study and consensus-building process to develop principles for increasing equity in WASH Research
Lue, J.-M.; Bah, S.; Grant, K.; Lee, J.; Nzekele, L.; Tidwell, J. B.
Show abstract
There have long been critiques of colonial legacies influencing global health. In recent years with growing public awareness of unjust systems, a new wave of calls for anti-racist initiatives and decolonization of the sector has emerged. This study examined research inequities in the water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) sector, centering the perspectives of researchers from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), to catalyze collective action in a sub-sector of global health. Nineteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with researchers of different backgrounds regarding nationality, gender, and research experience. Researchers from eight countries were asked about their experiences and direct observations of discrimination across various stages of the research process. Five interviews were conducted with key WASH research funders to assess perceptions of obstacles faced by LMIC researchers, successes achieved, and challenges faced by these organizations when working towards more equitable research processes within the WASH sector. The results were analyzed using an emergent framework that categorized experiences based on power differentials and abuse of power; structural barriers due to organizational policies; institutional and individual indifference; othering speech, action, and practices; and context-specific discrimination. The Socio-Ecological Model was also combined with this framework to identify the types of actors and level of coordination needed to address these issues. Respondents were often reluctant to describe actions as discriminatory unless there was clear intent. Researchers who worked in both LMICs and HICs at different career stages were particularly aware of discrimination. Ensuring pro-equity authorship and funding practices were identified as two significant actions to catalyze change within the sector. Sector-wide efforts must center LMIC voices when identifying research questions, conducting research, and dissemination. Individuals, organizations, and the entire WASH sector must examine how they participate in upholding inequitable systems of power to begin to dismantle the system through the intentional yielding of power and resources.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An emerging TIMER-2C framework for addressing barriers to research culture and productivity among local healthcare providers in the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative study and modified Delphi approach 95%
- “We are their eyes and ears here on the ground, yet they do not appreciate us” - Factors influencing the performance of Kenyan community health volunteers working in urban informal settlements 95%
- The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Stakeholder Insights to Enhance Engagement in PhD Professional Development 94%
- Leadership and Governance, Financing, and Coordination and their Impact on the Operationalization of Health Interventions in the Humanitarian-Development Nexus in South Sudan 93%
- How to attract and retain health workers in rural areas of a fragile state: findings from a labour market survey in Guinea 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lessons Learned From COVID-19 Modelling Efforts For Policy Decision-Making In Lower- And Middle-Income Countries 94%
- Public engagement and crowdfunding for health research: A global qualitative evidence synthesis and TDR pilot 93%
- Following the science? Views from scientists on government advisory boards during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study in five European countries 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Views and experiences of young people on using mHealth platforms for sexual and reproductive health services in rural low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review 93%
- Mothers’ experiences of using Facebook groups for local breastfeeding support: results of an online survey exploring midwife moderation 91%
- Digital Health Technologies for Accessing Contraceptive Services among Young People in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review Protocol 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The World According to Girls: A Qualitative Study of School, Work, and Identity Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women Living with HIV in Ghana 94%
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 94%
- "I had to leave. I had to leave my clinic, my city, leave everything behind in Syria". Qualitative accounts from Syrian health care workers migrating from the war-torn country 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.