Back

Phylogenomics reveals the relationships of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera): providing the potential landscape using universal single copy orthologues

Chen, Q.; Deng, M.; Wang, W.; Wang, X.; Chen, L.-S.; Huang, G.-H.

2022-10-14 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2022.10.14.512238 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundA robust and stable phylogenetic framework is a fundamental goal of evolutionary biology. As the third largest insect order following by Diptera and Coleoptera in the world, lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) play a central role in almost every terrestrial ecosystem as the indicators of environmental change and serve as important models for biologists exploring questions related to ecology and evolutionary biology. However, for such charismatic insect group, the higher-level phylogenetic relationships among its superfamilies are still poorly unresolved. Resultswe increased taxon sampling among Lepidoptera (40 superfamilies and 76 families contained 286 taxa) and filtered the unqualified samples, then acquired a series of large amino-acid datasets from 69,680 to 400,330 for phylogenomic reconstructions. Using these datasets, we explored the effect of different taxon sampling on tree topology by considering a series of systematic errors using ML and BI methods. Moreover, we also tested the effectiveness in topology robustness among the three ML-based models. The results showed that taxon sampling is an important determinant in tree robustness of accurate lepidopteran phylogenetic estimation. Long-branch attraction (LBA) caused by site-wise heterogeneity is a significant source of bias given rise to topologies divergence of ditrysia in phylogenomic reconstruction. Phylogenetic inference showed a most comprehensive framework by far to reveal the relationships among lepidopteran superfamilies, but limited by taxon sampling, it could only represent the current understanding of the lepidopteran tree of life. The relationships within the species-rich and relatively rapid radiation Ditrysia and especially Apoditrysia remain poorly unresolved, which need to increase taxon sampling and adopt lineage-specific genes for further phylogenomic reconstruction. ConclusionsThe present study further expands the taxon sampling of lepidopteran phylogeny and provides a potential phylogenomic foundation for further understanding its current higher-level relationships.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
8
Systematic Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
12
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
15
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
19
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
20
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
24
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%