Explainable Machine Learning to Identify Patient-specific Biomarkers for Lung Cancer
Sobhan, M.; Mondal, A. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundLung cancer is the leading cause of death compared to other cancers in the USA. The overall survival rate of lung cancer is not satisfactory even though there are cutting-edge treatment methods for cancers. Genomic profiling and biomarker gene identification of lung cancer patients may play a role in the therapeutics of lung cancer patients. The biomarker genes identified by most of the existing methods (statistical and machine learning based) belong to the whole cohort or population. That is why different people with the same disease get the same kind of treatment, but results in different outcomes in terms of success and side effects. So, the identification of biomarker genes for individual patients is very crucial for finding efficacious therapeutics leading to precision medicine. MethodsIn this study, we propose a pipeline to identify lung cancer class-specific and patient-specific key genes which may help formulate effective therapies for lung cancer patients. We have used expression profiles of two types of lung cancers, lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), and Healthy lung tissues to identify LUAD- and LUSC-specific (class-specific) and individual patient-specific key genes using an explainable machine learning approach, SHaphley Additive ExPlanations (SHAP). This approach provides scores for each of the genes for individual patients which tells us the attribution of each feature (gene) for each sample (patient). ResultIn this study, we applied two variations of SHAP - tree explainer and gradient explainer for which tree-based classifier, XGBoost, and deep learning-based classifier, convolutional neural network (CNN) were used as classification algorithms, respectively. Our results showed that the proposed approach successfully identified class-specific (LUAD, LUSC, and Healthy) and patient-specific key genes based on the SHAP scores. ConclusionThis study demonstrated a pipeline to identify cohort-based and patient-specific biomarker genes by incorporating an explainable machine learning technique, SHAP. The patient-specific genes identified using SHAP scores may provide biological and clinical insights into the patients diagnosis.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving prediction of drug-target interactions based on fusing multiple features with data balancing and feature selection techniques 96%
- Cardiac disease diagnosis based on GAN in case of missing data 96%
- Regional medical inter-institutional cooperation in medical provider network constructed using patient claims data from Japan 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of an absolute assignment predictor for triple-negative breast cancer subtyping using machine learning approaches 96%
- Unsupervised Discovery of Risk Profiles on Negative and Positive COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients 96%
- Identification of Myocardial Infarction (MI) Probability from Imbalanced Medical Survey Data: An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with Explainable AI (XAI) Insights 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fertility-LightGBM: A fertility-related protein prediction model by multi-information fusion and light gradient boosting machine 94%
- Expression Analysis, Molecular Characterization and Prognostic Evaluation on TMED4 and TMED9 Gene Expression in Glioma 92%
- A Fully Automated Deep Learning-based Network For Detecting COVID-19 from a New And Large Lung CT Scan Dataset 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Classification models for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Progression, based on gene expression data-trained supervised machine learning 96%
- A Convolution Based Computational Approach Towards DNA N6-methyladenine Site Identification and Motif Extraction in Rice Genome 96%
- Novel ratio-metric features enable the identification of new driver genes across cancer types 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.