Back

Identifying Contextual and Spatial Risk Factors for Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: An EHR-based Cohort Study from the RECOVER Program

Zhang, Y.; Hu, H.; Fokaidis, V.; Lewis, C.; Xu, J.; Zang, C.; Xu, Z.; Wang, F.; Koropsak, M.; Bian, J.; Hall, J.; Rothman, R.; Shenkman, E.; Wei, W.-Q.; Weiner, M. G.; Carton, T. W.; Kaushal, R.

2022-10-13 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2022.10.13.22281010 medRxiv
Show abstract

Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) affects a wide range of organ systems among a large proportion of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although studies have identified a broad set of patient-level risk factors for PASC, little is known about the contextual and spatial risk factors for PASC. Using electronic health data of patients with COVID-19 from two large clinical research networks in New York City and Florida, we identified contextual and spatial risk factors from nearly 200 environmental characteristics for 23 PASC symptoms and conditions of eight organ systems. We conducted a two-phase environment-wide association study. In Phase 1, we ran a mixed effects logistic regression with 5-digit ZIP Code tabulation area (ZCTA5) random intercepts for each PASC outcome and each contextual and spatial factor, adjusting for a comprehensive set of patient-level confounders. In Phase 2, we ran a mixed effects logistic regression for each PASC outcome including all significant (false positive discovery adjusted p-value < 0.05) contextual and spatial characteristics identified from Phase I and adjusting for confounders. We identified air toxicants (e.g., methyl methacrylate), criteria air pollutants (e.g., sulfur dioxide), particulate matter (PM2.5) compositions (e.g., ammonium), neighborhood deprivation, and built environment (e.g., food access) that were associated with increased risk of PASC conditions related to nervous, respiratory, blood, circulatory, endocrine, and other organ systems. Specific contextual and spatial risk factors for each PASC condition and symptom were different across New York City area and Florida. Future research is warranted to extend the analyses to other regions and examine more granular contextual and spatial characteristics to inform public health efforts to help patients recover from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
6
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
7
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
10
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
11
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
13
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
15
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
18
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%