Back

Identifying Contextual and Spatial Risk Factors for Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: An EHR-based Cohort Study from the RECOVER Program

Zhang, Y.; Hu, H.; Fokaidis, V.; Lewis, C.; Xu, J.; Zang, C.; Xu, Z.; Wang, F.; Koropsak, M.; Bian, J.; Hall, J.; Rothman, R.; Shenkman, E.; Wei, W.-Q.; Weiner, M. G.; Carton, T. W.; Kaushal, R.

2022-10-13 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2022.10.13.22281010
Show abstract

Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) affects a wide range of organ systems among a large proportion of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although studies have identified a broad set of patient-level risk factors for PASC, little is known about the contextual and spatial risk factors for PASC. Using electronic health data of patients with COVID-19 from two large clinical research networks in New York City and Florida, we identified contextual and spatial risk factors from nearly 200 environmental characteristics for 23 PASC symptoms and conditions of eight organ systems. We conducted a two-phase environment-wide association study. In Phase 1, we ran a mixed effects logistic regression with 5-digit ZIP Code tabulation area (ZCTA5) random intercepts for each PASC outcome and each contextual and spatial factor, adjusting for a comprehensive set of patient-level confounders. In Phase 2, we ran a mixed effects logistic regression for each PASC outcome including all significant (false positive discovery adjusted p-value < 0.05) contextual and spatial characteristics identified from Phase I and adjusting for confounders. We identified air toxicants (e.g., methyl methacrylate), criteria air pollutants (e.g., sulfur dioxide), particulate matter (PM2.5) compositions (e.g., ammonium), neighborhood deprivation, and built environment (e.g., food access) that were associated with increased risk of PASC conditions related to nervous, respiratory, blood, circulatory, endocrine, and other organ systems. Specific contextual and spatial risk factors for each PASC condition and symptom were different across New York City area and Florida. Future research is warranted to extend the analyses to other regions and examine more granular contextual and spatial characteristics to inform public health efforts to help patients recover from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 0.2%
16.1%
2
Environmental Health Perspectives
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
13.9%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 38%
13.1%
4
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 14%
10.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Environmental Research
based on 36 papers
Top 0.6%
7.9%
6
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 2%
5.6%
7
Environment International
based on 22 papers
Top 0.6%
4.7%
8
Science of The Total Environment
based on 80 papers
Top 2%
2.6%
9
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
based on 16 papers
Top 0.7%
1.9%
10
Environmental Science & Technology
based on 16 papers
Top 0.8%
1.9%
11
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 19%
1.3%
13
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
based on 17 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 24%
0.8%
15
Journal of Occupational Health
based on 11 papers
Top 0.8%
0.8%
16
Science Advances
based on 52 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
17
American Journal of Epidemiology
based on 54 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
18
American Journal of Infection Control
based on 12 papers
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
based on 15 papers
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
based on 32 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
21
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 8%
0.7%