Back

Development of Multi-Bundle Virtual Ligaments to Simulate Knee Mechanics after Total Knee Arthroplasty

Vakili, S.; Lanting, B.; Getgood, A.; Willing, R.

2022-10-17 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.10.12.511986 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Preclinical evaluation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components is essential to understanding their mechanical behavior and developing strategies for improving joint stability. While preclinical testing of TKA components has been useful in quantifying their effectiveness, such testing can be criticized for lacking clinical relevance, as the important contributions of surrounding soft tissues are either neglected or greatly simplified. The purpose of our study was to develop and determine if subject-specific virtual ligaments reproduce the same kinematics as native ligaments surrounding TKA joints. Five TKA knees were mounted to a motion simulator. Each was subjected to tests of anterior-posterior (AP), internal-external (IE), and varus-valgus (VV) laxity. The forces transmitted through major ligaments were measured using a sequential resection technique. By tuning the measured ligament forces and elongations to a generic non-linear elastic ligament model, virtual ligaments were designed and used to simulate the soft tissue envelope around isolated TKA components. The average root mean square error (RMSE) between the laxity results of TKA joints with native versus virtual ligaments was 2.9 mm during AP translation, 6.5{degrees} during IE rotations, and 2.0{degrees} during VV rotations, and there was no statistically significant difference between the results of both methods. Interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated a good level of reliability for AP and IE laxity (0.85 and 0.84). To conclude, a virtual ligament envelope around TKA joints can mimic natural knee behavior and is an effective method for the preclinical testing of TKA components.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.8%
2
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
7
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.4%
9
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
10
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
11
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
19
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%