Back

Taxonomy of introns, their evolution, and the role of minor introns in stress response

Olthof, A. M.; Schwoerer, C. F.; Weber, A. L.; Arokiadhas, I.; Doggett, K.; Mieruszynski, S.; Cnaani, A.; Heath, J. K.; Biran, J.; Kanadia, R. N.

2022-10-14 molecular biology
10.1101/2022.10.12.511939 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite the high conservation of minor introns across eukaryotic supergroups, specific lineages have completely lost minor intron splicing, which has raised questions about their evolution and purpose. Addressing these questions requires identification of the introns that are affected by minor spliceosome inhibition. To this end, we applied principles of Linnaean taxonomy combined with position-weight matrices to produce five intron classes: minor, minor-like, hybrid, major-like and major. We classified introns across the genomes of 263 species of six eukaryotic supergroups, which can be viewed at the Minor Intron Database (MIDB). Transcriptomic analysis revealed that [~]40% of the minor introns are responsive to minor spliceosome inhibition, while an additional 5% of the minor-like and hybrid introns are also affected. We propose that minor-like introns represent an intermediate in the conversion of minor to major introns and uncover the importance of a guanine at the -1 position of the 5 splice site in facilitating this shift in spliceosome dependence. Finally, we find that minor introns are aberrantly spliced in fish and plants upon cold stress, thereby providing a potential explanation for their high degree of conservation in these lineages.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.