A Generalizable Nanopore Sensor for Highly Specific Protein Detection at Single-Molecule Precision
Ahmad, M.; Ha, J.-H.; Mayse, L.; Presti, M.; Wolfe, A. J.; Moody, K. J.; Loh, S. N.; Movileanu, L.
Show abstract
Protein detection and biomarker profiling have wide-ranging implications in many areas of basic research and molecular diagnostics. Substantial progress has been made in protein analytics using nanopores and the resistive-pulse technique. Yet, a long-standing challenge is implementing specific binding interfaces for detecting proteins without the steric hindrance of the pore interior. To overcome this technological difficulty, we formulate a new class of sensing elements made of a programmable antibody-mimetic binder fused to a monomeric protein nanopore. This way, such a modular design significantly expands the utility of nanopore sensors to numerous proteins while preserving their architecture, specificity, and sensitivity. We prove the power of this approach by developing and validating nanopore sensors for protein analytes that drastically vary in size, charge, and structural complexity. These analytes produce unique electrical signatures that depend on their identity and quantity and the binder-analyte assembly at the nanopore tip. From a practical point of view, our sensors unambiguously probe protein recognition events without the necessity of using any additional exogenous tag. The outcomes of this work will impact biomedical diagnostics by providing a fundamental basis and tools for protein biomarker detection in biofluids.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A DNA-based optical nanosensor for in vivo imaging of acetylcholine in the peripheral nervous system 96%
- DNA origami demonstrate the unique stimulatory power of single pMHCs as T-cell antigens 96%
- Dissecting neurofilament tail sequence-phosphorylation-structure relationships with multicomponent reconstituted protein brushes 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.