Back

Development of an affinity-enhanced clinical candidate TCR targeting NY-ESO-1 with optimal potency and high specificity

Ou, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhan, K.; Wu, W.; Huang, J.; Sun, H.; Zheng, H.; Yu, X.; Gong, H.; Han, Z.; Chen, A.; Liao, Y.; Lin, Y.; Liu, G.; Liu, Q.; Ma, R.; Mei, Y.; Tang, X.; Weng, Z.; Wu, J.; Ye, Y.; Zhang, T.; Chen, J.; Chen, L.; Ding, Q.; Fan, H.; Hu, J.; Huang, J.; Huang, L.; Li, Q.; Li, S.; Liu, M.; Shi, J.; Tan, X.; Wang, X.; Xiang, R.; Yan, Q.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, W.; Zhong, S.

2022-10-17 immunology
10.1101/2022.10.12.511904 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The clinical success of T-cell receptor (TCR)-based immunotherapy depends on the efficacy and specificity of TCRs. Naturally occurring TCRs have limited anti-tumor potency due to their low affinity for tumor antigens. Affinity enhancement is a promising strategy to generate highly potent TCRs. However, it is concerned that affinity-enhanced TCRs are prone to lose specificity. We isolated low affinity TCRs specific for NY-ESO-1157-165/HLA-A*02:01 from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy donors. An affinity-enhanced TCR candidate with optimal affinity and specificity was generated using phage display and an extensive set of in vitro and in vivo assays. Alanine scanning mutagenesis showed that the TCR candidate retained specificity by making extensive contacts to the side chains of NY-ESO-1157-165 peptide. Adoptive transfer of T cells engineered with this candidate (termed TAEST16001) significantly inhibited tumor growth in subcutaneous, metastatic, and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse tumor models. This study demonstrates that sophisticated engineering and screening techniques can be utilized to generate a clinical candidate TCR with potent anti-tumor activity without losing specificity. TAEST16001 was approved by the Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE) as the first TCR-based immunotherapy clinical trial in China (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03159585).

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.