Back

MR1-restricted T cell clonotypes are associated with 'resistance' to M.tuberculosis infection

Cross, D. L.; Layton, E. D.; Yu, K. K.; Smith, M. T.; Aguilar, M. S.; Li, S.; Mayanja-Kizza, H.; Stein, C. M.; Boom, W. H.; Hawn, T. R.; Bradley, P.; Newell, E.; Seshadri, C.

2022-10-13 immunology
10.1101/2022.10.12.511825 bioRxiv
Show abstract

T cells are required for a protective immune response against the human adapted pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb). We recently described a cohort of Ugandan household contacts of tuberculosis cases that appear to resist M.tb infection (RSTRs) and showed that these individuals harbor IFN-{gamma} independent T cell responses to M.tb-specific peptide antigens. However, T cells also recognize non-protein antigens via antigen presenting systems that are independent of genetic background, leading to their designation as donor-unrestricted T (DURT) cells. We used combinatorial tetramer staining and multi-parameter flow cytometry to comprehensively characterize the association between DURTs and resistance to M.tb infection. We did not observe a difference in peripheral blood frequencies of invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells, germline encoded mycolyl-reactive (GEM) T cells, or {gamma}{delta} T cells between RSTRs and matched controls with latent M.tb infection (LTBIs). However, we did observe a 1.65-fold increase in frequency of circulating MR1-restricted T (MR1T) cells among RSTRs in comparison with LTBI (p=0.03). Multi-modal single cell RNA-sequencing of 18,251 MR1T cells sorted from a subset of donors revealed 5150 clonotypes that expressed a common transcriptional program, the majority of which were private. Deep sequencing of the TCR- repertoire revealed several DURT clonotypes that were expanded among RSTRs, including at least two MR1T clonotypes. Taken together, our data reveal unexpected donor-specific diversity in the TCR repertoire of human MR1T cells as well as associations between MR1 clonotypes and resistance to M.tb infection.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.