Investigating the oral microbiome in retrospective and prospective cases of prostate, colon, and breast cancer.
Nearing, J. T.; DeClercq, V.; Langille, M. G. I.
Show abstract
The human microbiome has been proposed as a useful biomarker for several different human diseases including various cancers. To answer this question, we examined salivary samples from two Canadian population cohorts, the Atlantic Partnership for Tomorrows Health project (PATH) and Albertas Tomorrow Project (ATP). Sample selection was then divided into both a retrospective and prospective case control design examining individuals with prostate, breast, or colon cancer. In total 89 retrospective and 260 prospective cancer cases were matched to non-cancer controls and saliva samples were sequenced using 16S rRNA gene sequencing to compare bacterial diversity, and taxonomic composition. We found no significant differences in alpha or beta diversity across any of the three cancer types and two study designs. Although retrospective colon cancer samples did show evidence on visual clustering in weighted beta diversity metrics. Differential abundance analysis of individual taxon showed several taxa that were associated with previous cancer diagnosis in all three groupings within the retrospective study design. However, only one genus (Ruminococcaceae UCG-014) in breast cancer and one ASV (Fusobacterium periodonticum) in colon cancer was identified by more than one differential abundance (DA) tool. In prospective cases of disease three ASVs were associated with colon cancer, one ASV with breast cancer, and one ASV with prostate cancer. None overlapped between the two different study cohorts. Attempting to identify microbial signals using Random Forest classification showed relatively low levels of signal in both prospective and retrospective cases of breast and prostate cancer (AUC range: 0.394-0.665). Contrastingly, colon cancer did show signal in our retrospective analysis (AUC: 0.745) and in one of two prospective cohorts (AUC: 0.717). Overall, our results indicate that it is unlikely that reliable oral microbial biomarkers of disease exist in the context of both breast and prostate cancer. However, they do suggest that further research into the relationship between the oral microbiome and colon cancer could be fruitful. Particularly in the context of early disease progression and risk of cancer development.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Gut Microbiome Dynamics and Predictive Value in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Shallow and Deep Shotgun Sequencing 94%
- Skin but not gut microbial communities in Antarctic fur seals vary with social density 93%
- Comparative metatranscriptomics of periodontitis supports a common polymicrobial shift in metabolic function and identifies novel putative disease-associated ncRNAs 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Updating urinary microbiome analyses to enhance biologic interpretation 92%
- Improved Metabolite Prediction Using Microbiome Data-Based Elastic Net Models 91%
- Evidence for the Existence of a Bacterial Etiology for Alzheimers Disease and for a Temporal-Spatial Development of a Pathogenic Microbiome in the Brain 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterogeneous lineage-specific arginine deiminase expression within dental microbiome species 93%
- Environmental and Population influences on Mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) Gut Microbiomes 93%
- Library Preparation and Sequencing Platform Introduce Bias in Metagenomic-Based Characterizations of Microbiomes 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the effects of library preparation procedure and sample characteristics on the accuracy of metagenomic profiles 92%
- Optimizing mouse metatranscriptome profiling by selective removal of redundant nucleic acid sequences 92%
- parafac4microbiome: Exploratory analysis of longitudinal microbiome data using Parallel Factor Analysis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.