Monkeypox vaccination willingness, determinants, and communication needs in gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, in the context of limited vaccine availability in the Netherlands (Dutch MPX-survey)
Dukers-Muijrers, N. H.; Evers, Y.; Widdershoven, V.; Davidovich, U.; Adam, P.; Op de Coul, E.; Zantkuijl, P.; Matser, A.; Prins, M.; de Vries, H.; den Heijer, C.; Hoebe, C. J.; Niekamp, A.-M.; Schneider, F.; Reyes-Uruena, J.; Croci, R.; Dambrosio, A.; van der Valk, M.; Posthouwer, D.; Ackens, R.; ter Waarbeek, H.; Noori, T.; Hoornenborg, E.
Show abstract
IntroductionIn the global monkeypox outbreak primary preventive vaccination is offered to people at higher risk for infection. We study vaccine acceptance and its determinants, to target and tailor public health (communication-)strategies in the context of limited vaccine supply in the Netherlands. Methods. Online survey in a convenience sample of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men, including transgender persons (22/07-05/09/2022, the Netherlands). We assessed determinants (sociodemographic, social environment, medical, and behavioral factors, and beliefs) for being (un)willing to accept vaccination. We used multivariable multinominal regression and logistic regression analyses, calculating adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95 percent confidence-intervals. An open question asked for campaigning and procedural recommendations. ResultsOf respondents, 81.5% (n=1,512/1,856) were willing to accept vaccination; this was 85.2% (799/938) in vaccination-eligible people (HIV-PrEP use, living with HIV, STI, or >3 partners) and 77.7% (713/918) in those non-eligible. Determinants for non-acceptance included: urbanization (rural: aOR:2.2;1.2-3.7; low-urban: aOR:2.4;1.4-3.9; versus high-urban), not knowing monkeypox-vaccinated persons (aOR:2.4;1.6-3.4), and lack of connection to gay/queer-community (aOR:2.0;1.5-2.7). Beliefs associated with acceptance were perception of higher risk/severity of monkeypox, higher protection motivation, positive outcome expectations post vaccination (effectiveness and side-effects), and perceived positive social norms regarding vaccination of their social network. Respondents recommended more accessible communication, delivered regularly, stigma-free, sex positive and with facts on monkeypox, vaccination benefits and procedures, and explain (other) preventive options. For vaccination, it was recommended to add self-registration, provision also at non-clinic settings, discrete/anonymous options, and more inclusive strategies to reach people (e.g., those not in existing patient-registries) at high risk for monkeypox. ConclusionIn the public health response to the monkeypox outbreak, key is a broad and equitable access to information, and low-threshold vaccination options for those at highest risk. Communication should be transparent and tailored to beliefs, such as perceived risks of monkeypox, benefits of vaccination, and social norms, and should include other preventive options. Public health efforts may be strengthened in less urbanized areas and reach out to those who lack relevant social network influences.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Access to HIV-prevention in female sex workers in Ukraine between 2009 and 2017: coverage, barriers and facilitators 96%
- Acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness of intensified health education, SMS/phone tracing and transport reimbursement for uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision in a sexually transmitted infections clinic in Malawi: a mixed methods study 95%
- Social inequalities in hostility toward vaccination against Covid-19 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social patterning and stability of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance in Scotland: Will those most at risk accept a vaccine? 95%
- Understanding Vaccination Uptake amongst Gay, Bisexual and other Men who have Sex with Men in UK Sexual Health Services: A Qualitative Interview Study 94%
- Essential Workers’ COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, Misinformation and Informational Needs in the Republic of North Macedonia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- “ Bringing testing closer to you ” – Barriers and Facilitators in Implementing HIV Self-Testing among Filipino Men-Having-Sex-with-Men and Transgender Women in National Capital Region (NCR), Philippines: A Qualitative Study 94%
- Implementation of Unassisted and Community-Based HIV Self-Testing (HIVST) during the COVID-19 pandemic among Men-who-have-sex-with-Men (MSM) and Transgender Women (TGW): A Demonstration Study in Metro Manila, Philippines 94%
- Vaccination or restriction?: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and vaccine passports 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measurement and interpretation of the Harare HIV combination prevention cascade in priority populations: A population survey of adolescent girls and young women and young men in Zimbabwe 94%
- Prevalence and factors associated with use of prophylaxis for HIV and sexually transmitted infections among sexual health service attendees in England: findings from a cross-sectional observational study 94%
- Factors affecting patients on antiretroviral therapy lost to follow up in Asunafo South District of Ahafo Region, Ghana: Cross-sectional Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Behavioural responses to Covid-19 health certification: A rapid review 95%
- Mpox knowledge, behaviours and barriers to public health measures among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in the UK: A qualitative study to inform public health guidance and messaging 95%
- "We have our reasons": Exploring the acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Ghana 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.