Longitudinal assessment of ROPRO as an early indicator of overall survival in oncology clinical trials: a retrospective analysis
Loureiro, H.; Kolben, T.; Kiermaier, A.; Rüttinger, D.; Ahmidi, N.; Becker, T.; Bauer-Mehnen, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe gold standard to evaluate treatment efficacy in oncology clinical trials is Overall Survival (OS). Its utility, however, is limited by the need for long trial duration and large sample sizes. Thus methods such as Progression-Free Survival (PFS) are applied to obtain early OS estimates across clinical trial phases, particularly to decide on further development of new molecular entities. Especially for cancer-immunotherapy, these established methods may be less suitable. Therefore, alternative approaches to obtain early OS estimates are required. In this work, we present a first evaluation of a new method, {Delta}Risk. {Delta}Risk uses the ROPRO, a state-of-the-art pan-cancer OS prognostic score, or DeepROPRO to predict OS benefit by measuring the patients improvement since baseline. Patients and methodsWe modeled the {Delta}Risk using Joint Models and tested whether a significant {Delta}Risk decrease correlated with OS improvement. We studied this hypothesis by comparing classical OS analysis against {Delta}Risk in a retrospective analysis of 12 real-world data emulated clinical trials, and 3 additional recent phase III immunotherapy clinical trials. ResultsOur new {Delta}Risk method correlated with the final OS readout in 14 out of 15 clinical trials. The {Delta}Risk, however, identified the treatment benefit up to seven months earlier than the OS log-rank test. Additionally, in two immunotherapy trials where PFS would have failed as an early OS estimate, the {Delta}Risk correctly predicted the treatment benefit. ConclusionsWe introduced a new method, {Delta}Risk, and demonstrated its correlation with OS. In retrospective analysis, {Delta}Risk is able to identify OS benefit earlier than standard methodology, and we show examples of lung cancer trials, where it maintains its predictive relevance whereas PFS does not correlate with OS. {Delta}Risk may prove useful for early decision support resulting in reduced need of resources. We also show the potential of {Delta}Risk as a candidate to define surrogate endpoints. To this purpose, more methodological work and further investigation of treatment-specific performance will be done in the future.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing randomized trial designs to estimate treatment effect in rare diseases with longitudinal models: a simulation study showcased by Autosomal Recessive Cerebellar Ataxias using the SARA score 92%
- KMSubtraction: Reconstruction of unreported subgroup survival data utilizing published Kaplan-Meier survival curves 92%
- Prediction-powered Inference for Clinical Trials 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- CFO: Calibration-Free Odds Bayesian Designs for Dose Finding in Clinical Trials 92%
- Machine learning and mechanistic modeling for prediction of metastatic relapse in breast cancer 91%
- NCT Precision Oncology Thesaurus Drugs – a Curated Database for Drugs, Drug Classes, and Drug Targets in Precision Cancer Medicine 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Survival Prediction Landscape: An In-Depth Systematic Literature Review on Activities, Methods, Tools, Diseases, and Databases 90%
- An Explainable Multi-Modal Neural Network Architecture for Predicting Epilepsy Comorbidities Based on Administrative Claims Data 89%
- Data-driven Discovery of Mathematical and Physical Relations in Oncology Data using Human-understandable Machine Learning 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reported Drug Spectrum and Disproportionality Signals for Malignant Neoplasm Progression in FAERS: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study 89%
- Simulating clinical trials for model-informed precision dosing: Using warfarin treatment as a use case 89%
- Bioluminescent zebrafish transplantation model for drug discovery 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Strength of Statistical Evidence for the Efficacy of Cancer Drugs: A Bayesian Re-Analysis of Trials Supporting FDA Approval 93%
- Income inequality and access to advanced immunotherapy for lung cancer: the case of Durvalumab in the Netherlands 92%
- Results dissemination from clinical trials conducted at German university medical centres was delayed and incomplete 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.