Cohort Profile: The Danish National Cohort Study of Effectiveness and Safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (ENFORCE)
Staerke, N. B.; Reekie, J.; Johansen, I. S.; Nielsen, H.; Benfield, T.; Wiese, L.; Soegaard, O. S.; Tolstrup, M.; Iversen, K. K.; Tarp, B.; Larsen, F. D.; Larsen, L.; Lindvig, S. O.; Holden, I. K.; Iversen, M. B.; Knudsen, L. S.; Fogh, K.; Jakobsen, M. L.; Traytel, A.; Oestergaard, L.; Lundgren, J.
Show abstract
PurposeThe ENFORCE cohort is a national Danish prospective cohort of adults who received a Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine as part of the Danish National SARS-CoV-2 vaccination program. It was designed to investigate the long-term effectiveness, safety and durability of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines used in Denmark. ParticipantsA total of 6943 adults scheduled to receive a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in the Danish COVID-19 Vaccination Program were enrolled in the study prior to their first vaccination. Participants will be followed for a total of two years with five predetermined follow-up visits and additional visits in relation to any booster vaccination. Serology measurements are performed after each study visit. T-cell immunity is evaluated at each study visit for a subgroup of 699 participants. Safety information is collected from participants at visits following each vaccination. Data on hospital admissions, diagnoses, deaths and SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results are collected from national registries throughout the study period. The median age of participants was 64 years (IQR 53-75), 56.6% were females and 23% were individuals with an increased risk of a serious course of COVID-19. A total of 340 (4.9%) participants tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG at baseline. Findings to dateResults have been published on risk factors for humoral hyporesponsiveness and non-durable response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, the risk of breakthrough infections at different levels of SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG by viral variant, and on the antibody neutralizing capacity against different SARS-CoV-2 variants following primary and booster vaccinations. Future plansThe ENFORCE cohort will continuously generate studies investigating immunological response, effectiveness, safety and durability of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Registrationclinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04760132. Strengths and limitations- The ENFORCE study combines repeated detailed SARS-CoV-2 specific immunological measurements prior to, and throughout the course of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with register-based follow-up of safety data and microbiological test results. - The ENFORCE cohort includes a large proportion of elderly participants and participants with concomitant diseases. - The three vaccine groups display a high degree of variation in demographic factors and distribution across risk groups, due to the prioritization of specific vaccines to risk groups during the primary roll out of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination program.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccination-induced antibody responses and waning by age and comorbidity status in a large population-based prospective cohort study 96%
- Antibody Response after Second-dose of ChAdOx1-nCOV (Covishield™ ® ) and BBV-152 (Covaxin™ ® ) among Health Care Workers in India: Final Results of Cross-sectional Coronavirus Vaccine-induced Antibody Titre (COVAT) study 96%
- Effectiveness of vaccines in preventing hospitalization due to COVID-19: A multicenter hospital-based case-control study, Germany, June 2021 to January 2022 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and efficacy of two immunization schedules with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in adults. A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial 97%
- Hybrid immunity improves the immune response after fourth Covid-19 vaccine dose in individuals with medical conditions predisposing to severe Covid-19 96%
- Persistent health issues, adverse events of significant concern, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination- findings from a real-world cohort study of healthcare workers in north India 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness rates by week and sources of bias 95%
- Reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review of spontaneously reported data from the UK, Europe, and the US and of the literature 94%
- COVID-19 vaccines and evidence-based medicine 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 COVID-19 vaccine in adults: data from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, phase 3 trial in Russia 96%
- Is the BioNTech-Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination effective in elderly populations? Results from population data from Bavaria, Germany 96%
- Effectiveness of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection and Covid-19 hospitalization among Finnish elderly and chronically ill – An interim analysis of a nationwide cohort study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and Safety Following a Homologous Booster Dose of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine (NVX-CoV2373): A Phase 2 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 96%
- Safety and immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine with AS03 adjuvant in healthy adults: interim findings from a phase 2, randomised, dose-finding, multi-centre study 95%
- Vaccine effectiveness of two and three doses of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac against COVID-19 in Hong Kong 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.