Incidence, risk and severity of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections in children and adolescents: a population-level study between March 2020 and July 2022
Medic, S.; Anastassopoulou, C.; Lozanov-Crvenkovic, Z.; Dragnic, N.; Petrovic, V.; Ristic, M.; Pustahija, T.; Tsakris, A.; Ioannidis, J.
Show abstract
IMPORTANCEDuring the COVID-19 pandemic children and adolescents were massively infected worldwide. In 2022 reinfections became increasingly common and they may continue to be a main feature of the endemic phase of SARS-CoV-2. It is important to understand the epidemiology and clinical impact of reinfections. OBJECTIVETo assess the incidence, risk, and severity of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in children and adolescents. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSA population-level observational study was performed using surveillance data from the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina, Serbia between March 6, 2020 and April 30, 2022 with follow-up until July 31, 2022. The population-based sample consisted of 32 524 residents of Vojvodina <18 years of age with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. EXPOSURESThe surveillance database of the Institute for Public Health of Vojvodina was harnessed for epidemiological data of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESIncidence rates of documented SARS-CoV-2 reinfection per 1000 person-months. Estimated risk of documented reinfection [≥]90 days after laboratory confirmation of primary infection. Reinfection severity and associated hospitalizations and deaths. RESULTSA total of 964 children (3.0%) experienced documented reinfection. The incidence rate of SARS-CoV-2 documented reinfections was 3.2 (CI 3.0-3.4) cases per 1000 person-months and was highest in adolescents aged 12-17 years (3.4; CI 3.2-3.7). Most reinfections (905, 93.9%) were recorded in 2022. The reinfection risk was 1.3% at six months, 1.9% at nine months, 4.0% at 12 months, 6.7% at 15 months, 7.2% at 18 months and 7.9% after 21 months. Pediatric COVID-19 cases were generally mild. The proportion of severe clinical forms decreased from 14 (1.4%) in initial episodes to 3 (0.3%) in reinfections. Reinfected children were 4.7 times more likely to suffer from severe disease during initial infection compared to reinfection (McNemar OR=4.7; 95%CI 1.3-16.2, p=0.015). Pediatric reinfections rarely led to hospitalization (0.5% vs. 1.3% during primary infections) and none resulted in death. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCEReinfections are becoming more frequent as the pandemic progresses, yet the risk remains substantially lower for children and adolescents compared to adults. Pediatric infections rarely had clinical consequences and reinfections were even milder than primary infections. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat is the incidence, risk and severity of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in children and adolescents? FindingsThis observational population-level study showed that the risk of pediatric reinfection remained less than 8% two years into the pandemic with an incidence rate of 3.2 (CI 3.0-3.4) cases per 1000 person-months. Pediatric COVID-19 cases were generally mild and reinfected children were 4.7 times more likely to suffer from severe disease during the initial infection compared to reinfection. MeaningThese findings suggest that documented reinfection risk remains substantially lower in the pediatric versus the adult population, with an even more favorable profile compared to primary infections.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical features and burden of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and adolescents: an exploratory EHR-based cohort study from the RECOVER program 94%
- Pediatric household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection 93%
- Acute upper airway disease in children with the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2: a report from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes of 55,270 children and adolescents diagnosed with COVID-19 and 1,952,693 with influenza in France, Germany, Spain, South Korea and the United States: an international network cohort study 93%
- Household Transmission and Clinical Features of SARS-CoV-2 Infections by Age in 2 US Communities 92%
- Severe outcomes in unvaccinated COVID-19 cases <18 years during different variant waves in Norway 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neutralizing antibodies following three doses of BNT162b2 vaccine, breakthrough infection, and symptoms during the Omicron predominant wave 92%
- Vaccine effectiveness with BNT162b2 (Comirnaty, Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine against reported SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron infection among adolescents, Norway, August 2021 to January 2022 92%
- The attributable fraction of respiratory syncytial virus among patients of different age with influenza-like illness and severe acute respiratory illness in a high HIV prevalence setting, South Africa, 2012-2016 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Serious hospital events following symptomatic infection with Sars-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta variants: an exposed-unexposed cohort study in December 2021 from the COVID-19 surveillance databases in France 92%
- Antibody persistence and neutralising activity in primary school students and staff: prospective active surveillance, June to December 2020, England 92%
- Omicron B.1.1.529 variant infections associated with severe disease are uncommon in a COVID-19 under-vaccinated, high SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence population in Malawi 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 in the Omicron Era is Associated with Increased Risk of Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A RECOVER-EHR Cohort Study 94%
- Protection against Omicron re-infection conferred by prior heterologous SARS-CoV-2 infection, with and without mRNA vaccination 94%
- Initial protection against Omicron in children and adolescents by BNT162b2 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.