Back

Targeting tumour-intrinsic neural vulnerabilities of glioblastoma

Lee, S.; Weiss, T.; Buehler, M.; Mena, J.; Lottenbach, Z.; Wegmann, R.; Bihl, M.; Augustynek, B.; Baumann, S.; Goetze, S.; van Drogen, A.; Rushing, E. J.; Wollscheid, B.; Hediger, M. A.; Weller, M.; Snijder, B.

2022-10-07 cancer biology
10.1101/2022.10.07.511321 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glioblastoma is the most common yet deadliest primary brain cancer1. The neural behavior of glioblastoma, including the formation of synaptic circuitry and tumour microtubes, is increasingly understood to be pivotal for disease manifestation2-9. Nonetheless, the few approved treatments for glioblastoma target its oncological nature, while its neural vulnerabilities remain incompletely mapped and clinically unexploited. Here, we systematically survey the neural molecular dependencies and cellular heterogeneity across glioblastoma patients and diverse model systems. In 27 surgical patient samples, we identify cancer cell morphologies indicative of poor prognosis, and discover repurposable neuroactive drugs with anti-glioblastoma efficacy by image-based drug screening. Glioblastoma cells exhibit functional dependencies on highly expressed neuroactive drug targets, while interpretable molecular machine learning (COSTAR) reveals their downstream convergence on AP-1-driven tumour suppression. This drug-target connectivity signature is confirmed by accurate in silico drug screening on >1 million compounds, as well as by multi-omic profiling of glioblastoma drug responses. Thus, Ca2+-driven AP-1 pathway induction represents a tumour-intrinsic vulnerability at the intersection of oncogenesis and neural activity-dependent signaling. Opportunities for clinical translation of this neural vulnerability are epitomized by the antidepressant Vortioxetine synergizing with current standard of care treatments in vivo. Together, the results presented here provide a mechanistic foundation and conceptual framework for the treatment of glioblastoma based on its neural origins.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.