Back

Embracing fine-root system complexity to improve the predictive understanding of ecosystem functioning

Wang, B.; McCormack, L.; Ricciuto, D.; yang, x.; Iversen, C.

2022-10-08 ecology
10.1101/2022.10.07.511037 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Projecting the functioning of the biosphere requires a holistic consideration of whole-ecosystem processes. Although improving leaf and canopy processes has been the focus of ecosystem model development since the 1970s, the arbitrary homogenization of fine-root systems into a single pool is at odds with observations. This discrepancy has increased in the last two decades as accelerated conceptual and empirical advances have revealed functional differentiation and cooperation conferred by the hierarchical structure of fine-root orders and associations with mycorrhizal fungi in fine-root systems. To close this model-data gap, we propose a 3-pool structure comprising Transport and Absorptive fine roots with Mycorrhizal fungi (TAM) to model vertically resolved fine-root systems across organizational and spatial-temporal scales. A comparison of TAM to the single fine-root structure in a state-of-the-art Earth System Model using the big-leaf approach demonstrates robust impacts on carbon cycling in temperate forests, lending further quantitative support to the empirical and theoretical basis for TAM. Strong support in both theory and practice therefore suggests a move beyond the useful but incorrect paradigm of single-pool homogenization, echoing a broad trend of embracing ecological complexities in terrestrial ecosystem modelling. Although challenges lay ahead towards realizing TAM in ecologically realistic demography models simulating emergent functioning from pattern and diversity, adoption of TAM by both modelers and empiricists holds promise to build a better predictive understanding of ecosystem functioning in the context of global change.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.