Back

Mitigating the Severity of COVID-19 Illness in the Primary Care Patient Population through Early Identification and Close Monitoring of Underlying Comorbidities

Parikh, P. D.; Greenberg, P.; Halpert, S.; Abhrishami, A.; Rabizadeh, L.; Shayefar, H.; Tetelbaun, L.; Friedman, D.; Kaminetzky, J.

2022-10-10 primary care research
10.1101/2022.10.07.22280827 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposePrior studies have identified risk factors which prognosticate severity of SARS-CoV-2 illness among hospitalized patients. Since the majority of patients first present to ambulatory care sites, there is a need to identify early predictors of disease progression in this population. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study investigated the impact of underlying comorbid conditions on SARS-CoV-2 infection severity in the ambulatory setting. All patients who presented to a single federally qualified health center (FQHC) between March-May 2020 with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test were reviewed for inclusion. Patient demographics, symptomology, prior medical history, and outcomes were collected. Results301 patients were included, with nearly equal numbers of patients with (n=151) and without (n=150) underlying comorbidities. Overall, 269 patients (89%) had a mild outcome and 32 patients (11%) had a severe outcome. Advanced age (OR: 9.4 [95% CI: 3.4-27.4], p < 0.001) and male gender (OR: 3.2 [95% CI: 1.2-9.8], p = 0.02) were significant predictors of severe outcomes. Additionally, every obesity category (1: BMI = 30.0-34.9; 2: BMI = 35-39.9; 3: BMI = 40.0+) was associated with more severe outcomes compared to non-obese (OR: 3.5, p = 0.05; OR: 5.2, p = 0.03; OR: 13.9, p = 0.01). Compared to an HbA1C < 6, an HbA1C of 7.1-8.0 showed a clinically significant association. ConclusionSARS-CoV-2 severity can be prognosticated in the ambulatory population by the presence and severity of pre-existing comorbidities. Early identification and risk stratification of these comorbidities will allow clinicians to develop plans for closer monitoring to prevent severe illness.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.