Setd2 inactivation sensitizes lung adenocarcinoma to inhibitors of oxidative respiration and mTORC1 signaling
Walter, D. M.; Gladstein, A. C.; Doerig, K. R.; Natesan, R.; Baskaran, S. G.; Gudiel, A. A.; Adler, K. M.; Acosta, J. O.; Wallace, D. C.; Asangani, I. A.; Feldser, D. M.
Show abstract
SETD2 is a tumor suppressor that is frequently inactivated in several cancer types. The mechanisms through which SETD2 inactivation promotes cancer are unclear, and whether targetable vulnerabilities exist in these tumors is unknown. Here we identify heightened mTORC1-associated gene expression programs and functionally higher levels of oxidative metabolism and protein synthesis as prominent consequences of Setd2 inactivation in KRAS-driven mouse models of lung adenocarcinoma. Blocking oxidative respiration and mTORC1 signaling abrogates the high rates of tumor cell proliferation and tumor growth specifically in SETD2-deficient tumors. Our data nominate SETD2 deficiency as a functional marker of sensitivity to clinically actionable therapeutics targeting oxidative respiration and mTORC1 signaling.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer Cells Upregulate Mitochondrial One-Carbon Metabolism To Meet Purine Demand, Eliciting A Critical Targetable Vulnerability 94%
- Integrative analysis of patient-derived tumoroids and ex vivo organoid modeling of ARID1A loss in bladder cancer reveals therapeutic molecular targets 94%
- Novel EGFR-Mutant Mouse Models of Lung Adenocarcinoma Reveal Adaptive Immunity Requirement for Durable Osimertinib Response 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- p53 restoration in small cell lung cancer identifies a latent Cyclophilin-dependent necrosis mechanism 95%
- FTO-mediated cytoplasmic m6Am demethylation adjusts stem-like properties in colorectal cancer cell 94%
- Occult polyclonality of preclinical pancreatic cancer models drives in vitro evolution. 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.